These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21621745)
1. The effects of user factors and symbol referents on public symbol design using the stereotype production method. Ng AW; Siu KW; Chan CC Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):230-8. PubMed ID: 21621745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives toward the stereotype production method for public symbol design: a case study of novice designers. Ng AW; Siu KW; Chan CC Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 22632980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age-related differences in warning symbol comprehension and training effectiveness: effects of familiarity, complexity, and comprehensibility. Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Wogalter MS; Powell WR Ergonomics; 2011 Oct; 54(10):879-90. PubMed ID: 21973000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of sign characteristics and training methods on safety sign training effectiveness. Chan AH; Ng AW Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1325-46. PubMed ID: 20967656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Barton A; Sevcik RA; Romski MA Augment Altern Commun; 2006 Mar; 22(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 17114155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features. Ng AW; Chan AH Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Nov; 39(6):1245-57. PubMed ID: 17920849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of age on symbol comprehension in central rail hubs in Taiwan. Liu YC; Ho CH Appl Ergon; 2012 Nov; 43(6):1016-25. PubMed ID: 22424647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of sign design features on bicycle pictorial symbols for bicycling facility signs. Oh K; Rogoff A; Smith-Jackson T Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):990-5. PubMed ID: 23623234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How Universal Are Universal Symbols? An Estimation of Cross-Cultural Adoption of Universal Healthcare Symbols. Joy Lo CW; Yien HW; Chen IP HERD; 2016 Apr; 9(3):116-34. PubMed ID: 26744038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The guessing of mine safety signs meaning: effects of user factors and cognitive sign features. Chan AH; Ng AW Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2012; 18(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 22721538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety symbol comprehension: effects of symbol type, familiarity, and age. Hancock HE; Rogers WA; Schroeder D; Fisk AD Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 15359669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognition of iconicity doesn't come for free. Namy LL Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):841-6. PubMed ID: 19046152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aging and stereotype suppression. Radvansky GA; Lynchard NA; von Hippel W Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009; 16(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 18608050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems. Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception and multimeaning analysis of graphic symbols for Thai picture-based communication system. Chompoobutr S; Potibal P; Boriboon M; Phantachat W Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Mar; 8(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 23244464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs. Alant E; Life H; Harty M Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 16101272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of gender on communication of health information to older adults. Dearborn JL; Panzer VP; Burleson JA; Hornung FE; Waite H; Into FH J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Apr; 54(4):637-41. PubMed ID: 16686875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Who is who: Italian norms for visual recognition and identification of celebrities. Bizzozero I; Ferrari F; Pozzoli S; Saetti MC; Spinnler H Neurol Sci; 2005 Jun; 26(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 15995826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of age-stereotype priming on the memory performance of older adults. Stein R; Blanchard-Fields F; Hertzog C Exp Aging Res; 2002; 28(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 11928527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Letter Digit Substitution Test: normative data for 1,858 healthy participants aged 24-81 from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS): influence of age, education, and sex. van der Elst W; van Boxtel MP; van Breukelen GJ; Jolles J J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Aug; 28(6):998-1009. PubMed ID: 16822738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]