These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21621949)

  • 1. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived risk of medicine side effects in users of a patient information website: a study of the use of verbal descriptors, percentages and natural frequencies.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; Raynor DK; Woolf E
    Br J Health Psychol; 2009 Sep; 14(Pt 3):579-94. PubMed ID: 18992183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating a combined (frequency and percentage) risk expression to communicate information on medicine side effects to patients.
    Knapp P; Gardner P; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Aug; 21(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 23419135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Smith DM; Ubel PA; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 17652180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Berry DC
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 15175486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
    Fagerlin A; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Jankovic A; Derry HA; Smith DM
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 17641137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Aug; 84(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 20728298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high- and low-numerate individuals.
    Keller C; Siegrist M; Visschers V
    Risk Anal; 2009 Sep; 29(9):1255-64. PubMed ID: 19572963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; McMillan B
    Drug Saf; 2009; 32(10):837-49. PubMed ID: 19722727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health literacy and numeracy: key factors in cancer risk comprehension.
    Donelle L; Arocha JF; Hoffman-Goetz L
    Chronic Dis Can; 2008; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived risk of tamoxifen side effects: a study of the use of absolute frequencies or frequency bands, with or without verbal descriptors.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Raynor DK; Woolf E; McMillan B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 May; 79(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 19896321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
    Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
    J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a familiar risk comparison within a risk ladder to improve risk understanding by low numerates: a study of visual attention.
    Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1043-54. PubMed ID: 21284684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis--a phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses.
    Kasper J; Köpke S; Mühlhauser I; Heesen C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 16098706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn't just about literacy.
    Hibbard JH; Peters E; Dixon A; Tusler M
    Med Care Res Rev; 2007 Aug; 64(4):379-94. PubMed ID: 17684108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.
    Peters E; Hibbard J; Slovic P; Dieckmann N
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 17485752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.