These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21621962)
1. Accuracy and precision of two computer-assisted methods of radiographic wear measurement in total hip arthroplasty. Crockarell JR; Snearly CM J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jan; 27(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 21621962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reassessment of computerized wear measurement for total hip arthroplasty with correction for projectional image distortion: a brief follow-up report. Kraay MJ; Moore RD; Martell JM; Rimnac CM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(9):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20686060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring orthopedic implant wear on standard radiographs with a precision in the 10 microm-range. Burckhardt K; Dora C; Gerber C; Hodler J; Székely G Med Image Anal; 2006 Aug; 10(4):520-9. PubMed ID: 16872862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Submillimeter measurement of cup migration in clinical standard radiographs. Burckhardt K; Székely G; Nötzli H; Hodler J; Gerber C IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):676-88. PubMed ID: 15889554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of reproducibility and accuracy in templating hybrid total hip arthroplasty using digital radiographs. Oddy MJ; Jones MJ; Pendegrass CJ; Pilling JR; Wimhurst JA J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):581-5. PubMed ID: 16645101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a computer-assisted method for measurement of radiographic wear in total hip arthroplasty using all polyethylene cemented acetabular components. Langlois J; Zaoui A; Scemama C; Martell J; Bragdon C; Hamadouche M J Orthop Res; 2015 Mar; 33(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 25564735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The determination of linear and angular penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement: a comparison of four computer-assisted methods. Geerdink CH; Grimm B; Vencken W; Heyligers IC; Tonino AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jul; 90(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 18591589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? Iorio R; Siegel J; Specht LM; Tilzey JF; Hartman A; Healy WL J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 18534425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision and limitation of measuring two-dimensional wear on clinical radiographs. Wan Z; Boutary M; Dorr LD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Aug; 449():267-74. PubMed ID: 16702911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a digital image processing software package for the in vivo measurement of wear in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasties. Kennard E; Wilcox RK; Hall RM Med Eng Phys; 2006 May; 28(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 16122967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Whiddon DR; Bono JV; Lang JE; Smith EL; Salyapongse AK Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Aug; 40(8):395-8. PubMed ID: 22016868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of radiographic quality on computer-assisted head penetration measurements. Sychterz CJ; Young AM; Engh CA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 May; (386):150-8. PubMed ID: 11347828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of methods to measure femoral head penetration within metal-backed acetabular components. Callary SA; Solomon LB; Holubowycz OT; Campbell DG; Howie DW J Orthop Res; 2017 May; 35(5):988-996. PubMed ID: 27357247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Levine B; Fabi D; Deirmengian C Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):797. PubMed ID: 21053892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic stereometry for non-metal-backed acetubular cups: 3D wear estimation and related uncertainty. Sarry L; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Levai JP; Boire JY Med Image Anal; 2005 Jun; 9(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 15854846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital image analysis: improving accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic measurement. Bould M; Barnard S; Learmonth ID; Cunningham JL; Hardy JR Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jul; 14(6):434-7. PubMed ID: 10521626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Gamble P; de Beer J; Petruccelli D; Winemaker M J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):529-32. PubMed ID: 19493647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental analysis of Model-Based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (MBRSA) on four typical prosthesis components. Seehaus F; Emmerich J; Kaptein BL; Windhagen H; Hurschler C J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041004. PubMed ID: 19275433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of radiographic and radiostereometric wear measurement of different hip prostheses: an experimental study. von Schewelov T; Sanzén L; Börlin N; Markusson P; Onsten I Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Dec; 75(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 15762258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]