These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21621979)

  • 1. Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Cremonini CC; Dumas M; Pannuti CM; Neto JB; Cavalcanti MG; Lima LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):845-50. PubMed ID: 21621979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible.
    Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA
    N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
    Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cone beam computed tomography and SimPlant materialize dental software versus direct measurement of the width and height of the posterior mandible: an anatomic study.
    Maloney K; Bastidas J; Freeman K; Olson TR; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1923-9. PubMed ID: 21496995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
    Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
    Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 64-Detector-Multislice and Cone Beam Computed Tomographies in the Evaluation of Linear Measurements in the Alveolar Ridge.
    Pena de Andrade JG; Valerio CS; de Oliveira Monteiro MA; de Carvalho Machado V; Manzi FR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 26929949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of linear measurements performed with two imaging software in cone-beam computed tomography scans of dry human mandibles.
    Silva AALS; Franco A; Fernandes Â; Costa C; Barbosa JS; Westphalen FH
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2017; 89(4):2865-2873. PubMed ID: 29236870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.
    Patcas R; Markic G; Müller L; Ullrich O; Peltomäki T; Kellenberger CJ; Karlo CA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):637-44. PubMed ID: 22554987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography.
    Naitoh M; Hirukawa A; Katsumata A; Ariji E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 19250241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
    Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphometric and morphologic evaluation of the mental foramen in relation to age and sex: an anatomic cone beam computed tomography study.
    Çağlayan F; Sümbüllü MA; Akgül HM; Altun O
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2227-30. PubMed ID: 25340692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
    Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.
    Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Zaidi H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19829166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.