These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2162236)

  • 1. Nonpalpable breast masses: radiologic predictability of malignancy.
    Hermann G; Keller RJ; Schwartz IS; Papatestas A; Rajagopalan B; Rabinowitz JG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1990 Jun; 41(3):130-2. PubMed ID: 2162236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic importance of the radiographic density of noncalcified breast masses: analysis of 91 lesions.
    Jackson VP; Dines KA; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Reynolds HE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1646563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancer: serial radiologic-pathologic correlation in 27 cases.
    Stomper PC; Davis SP; Weidner N; Meyer JE
    Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 2847231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation by means of fine-needle aspiration cytology.
    Hann L; Ducatman BS; Wang HH; Fein V; McIntire JM
    Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 2539608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scintimammographic analysis of nonpalpable breast lesions previously identified by conventional mammography.
    Tolmos J; Cutrone JA; Wang B; Vargas HI; Stuntz M; Mishkin FS; Diggles LE; Venegas RJ; Klein SR; Khalkhali I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(11):846-9. PubMed ID: 9625173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. A 5-year study.
    Thompson WR; Bowen JR; Dorman BA; Pricolo VE; Shahinian TK; Soderberg CH
    Arch Surg; 1991 Jun; 126(6):730-3; discussion 733-4. PubMed ID: 1645516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance and staging of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.
    Schwartz GF; Feig SA; Patchefsky AS
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jan; 166(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 2827328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic guidewire localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Jeter DD; Vest GR; Buday SJ
    Am Surg; 1991 Jul; 57(7):431-3. PubMed ID: 1647713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonpalpable breast cancer.
    Bunnell DH; Bassett LW; Eggerding F; Steckel R
    Am Fam Physician; 1987 May; 35(5):147-51. PubMed ID: 3034014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided?
    Guo Y; Raghu M; Durand M; Hooley R
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170816. PubMed ID: 29338316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonpalpable ductal carcinoma in situ versus infiltrating carcinoma of the breast--can they be differentiated by mammography?
    Hermann G; Keller RJ; Halton K; Schwartz I; Rabinowitz JG; Tartter P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Jun; 42(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 1647259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):439-42. PubMed ID: 8029411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multivariate analysis of roentgenologic characteristics and risk factors for nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast.
    Harkins K; Tartter PI; Hermann G; Squitieri R; Brower ST; Keller RJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 8173725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of mammographic indeterminate lesions. First place winner of the Conrad Jobst Award in the Gold Medal paper competition.
    Hamby LS; McGrath PC; Stelling CB; Baker KF; Sloan DA; Kenady DE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
    Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative approach to nonpalpable breast biopsies.
    Reid SE; Scanlon EF; Bernstein JR; Paige ML; Matsumura J; Bailey L
    J Surg Oncol; 1990 Jun; 44(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 2162454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
    Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective study of double diagnosis of nonpalpable lesions of the breast.
    Dowlatshahi K; Jokich PM; Kluskens LF; Patel R; Economou SG
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Feb; 172(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1846452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.