189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21622934)
1. The Yale cTAKES extensions for document classification: architecture and application.
Garla V; Lo Re V; Dorey-Stein Z; Kidwai F; Scotch M; Womack J; Justice A; Brandt C
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):614-20. PubMed ID: 21622934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MITRE system for clinical assertion status classification.
Clark C; Aberdeen J; Coarr M; Tresner-Kirsch D; Wellner B; Yeh A; Hirschman L
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 21515542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information extraction from multi-institutional radiology reports.
Hassanpour S; Langlotz CP
Artif Intell Med; 2016 Jan; 66():29-39. PubMed ID: 26481140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of machine-learning-based approaches to extract clinical entities and their assertions from discharge summaries.
Jiang M; Chen Y; Liu M; Rosenbloom ST; Mani S; Denny JC; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):601-6. PubMed ID: 21508414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A knowledge discovery and reuse pipeline for information extraction in clinical notes.
Patrick JD; Nguyen DH; Wang Y; Li M
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 21737844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text.
Uzuner Ö; South BR; Shen S; DuVall SL
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 21685143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A flexible framework for deriving assertions from electronic medical records.
Roberts K; Harabagiu SM
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 21724741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Knowledge-based biomedical word sense disambiguation: an evaluation and application to clinical document classification.
Garla VN; Brandt C
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(5):882-6. PubMed ID: 23077130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ontology-guided feature engineering for clinical text classification.
Garla VN; Brandt C
J Biomed Inform; 2012 Oct; 45(5):992-8. PubMed ID: 22580178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated concept-level information extraction to reduce the need for custom software and rules development.
D'Avolio LW; Nguyen TM; Goryachev S; Fiore LD
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 21697292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports.
Yetisgen-Yildiz M; Gunn ML; Xia F; Payne TH
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():1593-602. PubMed ID: 22195225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications.
Savova GK; Masanz JJ; Ogren PV; Zheng J; Sohn S; Kipper-Schuler KC; Chute CG
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2010; 17(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 20819853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.
Weng WH; Wagholikar KB; McCray AT; Szolovits P; Chueh HC
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 29191207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Classification of Free-Text Radiology Reports: Using Different Feature Extraction Methods to Identify Fractures of the Distal Fibula.
Dewald CLA; Balandis A; Becker LS; Hinrichs JB; von Falck C; Wacker FK; Laser H; Gerbel S; Winther HB; Apfel-Starke J
Rofo; 2023 Aug; 195(8):713-719. PubMed ID: 37160146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mining fall-related information in clinical notes: Comparison of rule-based and novel word embedding-based machine learning approaches.
Topaz M; Murga L; Gaddis KM; McDonald MV; Bar-Bachar O; Goldberg Y; Bowles KH
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Feb; 90():103103. PubMed ID: 30639392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of transportability of an existing smoking status detection module across institutions.
Liu M; Shah A; Jiang M; Peterson NB; Dai Q; Aldrich MC; Chen Q; Bowton EA; Liu H; Denny JC; Xu H
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():577-86. PubMed ID: 23304330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010.
de Bruijn B; Cherry C; Kiritchenko S; Martin J; Zhu X
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 21565856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural Language Processing in Radiology: A Systematic Review.
Pons E; Braun LM; Hunink MG; Kors JA
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):329-43. PubMed ID: 27089187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ontology-based clinical information extraction from physician's free-text notes.
Yehia E; Boshnak H; AbdelGaber S; Abdo A; Elzanfaly DS
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Oct; 98():103276. PubMed ID: 31473365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of a Machine Learning Classifier of Knee MRI Reports in Two Large Academic Radiology Practices: A Tool to Estimate Diagnostic Yield.
Hassanpour S; Langlotz CP; Amrhein TJ; Befera NT; Lungren MP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):750-753. PubMed ID: 28140627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
