269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21623209)
1. Comparison of FIGO 1989 and 2009 recommendations on staging of endometrial carcinoma: pathologic analysis and cervical status in 123 consecutive cases.
Korczynski J; Jesionek-Kupnicka D; Gottwald L; Piekarski J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 21623209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significant variation in the assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma: an interobserver variation study.
McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Wilson GE; Oliva E; Soslow RA; Zaino RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21263250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Endometrial cancer. Clinico-surgical classification and treatment results (analysis of 134 patients)].
Torres Lobatón A; Flores Villa J; Román Bassaure E; Rojo Herrera G; Barra García R; Hernández Aten D
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Sep; 66():381-8. PubMed ID: 9789412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of exploratory laparotomy in patients with endometrial carcinoma according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging.
Vardi JR; Tadros GH; Anselmo MT; Rafla SD
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 1635733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinicopathologic analysis of 187 high-grade endometrial carcinomas of different histologic subtypes: similar outcomes belie distinctive biologic differences.
Soslow RA; Bissonnette JP; Wilton A; Ferguson SE; Alektiar KM; Duska LR; Oliva E
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jul; 31(7):979-87. PubMed ID: 17592263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of hysteroscopic imaging in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Garuti G; De Giorgi O; Sambruni I; Cellani F; Luerti M
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jun; 81(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 11371130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Alektiar KM; Venkatraman E; Chi DS; Barakat RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15850910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of the amount of myometrial invasion in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma.
Alektiar KM; McKee A; Lin O; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ; Mychalczak BR; McKee B; Hoskins WJ; Barakat RR
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 12124832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic impact of morphometric nuclear grade of endometrial carcinoma.
Salvesen HB; Iversen OE; Akslen LA
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(5):956-64. PubMed ID: 9731900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical application of adult comorbidity evaluation-27 in endometrial cancer].
Tian WY; Wang YM; Yan Y; Gao JP; Sun DD; Jiang S; Sheng Y; Teng F; Xue FX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):810-817. PubMed ID: 27916063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma].
Li B; Wu LY; Li SM; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Ma SK
Ai Zheng; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1085-8. PubMed ID: 15363208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endometrial carcinosarcomas have a different prognosis and pattern of spread compared to high-risk epithelial endometrial cancer.
Amant F; Cadron I; Fuso L; Berteloot P; de Jonge E; Jacomen G; Van Robaeys J; Neven P; Moerman P; Vergote I
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 15972232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
