274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21623209)
21. Is endometrial carcinoma intrinsically more aggressive in elderly patients?
Alektiar KM; Venkatraman E; Abu-Rustum N; Barakat RR
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2368-77. PubMed ID: 14635071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preoperative cervical cytology in endometrial carcinoma and its clinicopathologic relevance.
Fukuda K; Mori M; Uchiyama M; Iwai K; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H; Yamasaki F
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Mar; 72(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 10053095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A validation study of the new revised FIGO staging system to estimate prognosis for patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer.
Todo Y; Kato H; Minobe S; Okamoto K; Suzuki Y; Konno Y; Takeda M; Watari H; Kaneuchi M; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 21194738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors.
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki J; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov; 99(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 16005945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Epidemiologic and surgicopathologic findings of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared to endometrioid carcinoma.
Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 10479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endometrial carcinoma: the relevance of cervical cytology.
DuBeshter B; Warshal DP; Angel C; Dvoretsky PM; Lin JY; Raubertas RF
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Mar; 77(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 1992417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of age on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lachance JA; Everett EN; Greer B; Mandel L; Swisher E; Tamimi H; Goff B
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jun; 101(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 16413048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective multicenter validation confirms the prognostic superiority of the endometrial carcinoma prognostic index in international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma.
Baak JP; Snijders W; van Diermen B; van Diest PJ; Diepenhorst FW; Benraadt J
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4214-21. PubMed ID: 14615450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic impact of histological grade and vascular invasion compared with tumour cell proliferation in endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid type.
Stefansson IM; Salvesen HB; Immervoll H; Akslen LA
Histopathology; 2004 May; 44(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 15139995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Architectural versus nuclear atypia-defined FIGO grade 2 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEC): a clinicopathologic comparison of 154 cases with clinical follow-up.
Winham WM; Lin D; Stone PJ; Nucci MR; Quick CM
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Mar; 33(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 24487465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Significance of lower uterine segment involvement in women with stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Gemer O; Uriev L; Harkovsky T; Peled R; Ben-Dor D; Barak F; Segal S
J Reprod Med; 2004 Sep; 49(9):703-6. PubMed ID: 15493559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiation-associated endometrial cancers are prognostically unfavorable tumors: a clinicopathologic comparison with 527 sporadic endometrial cancers.
Pothuri B; Ramondetta L; Eifel P; Deavers MT; Wilton A; Alektiar K; Barakat R; Soslow RA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):948-51. PubMed ID: 16870239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading.
Sagae S; Saito T; Satoh M; Ikeda T; Kimura S; Mori M; Sato N; Kudo R
Oncology; 2004; 67(5-6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15713989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.
Jolly S; Vargas CE; Kumar T; Weiner SA; Brabbins DS; Chen PY; Floyd W; Martinez AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 16545441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical significance of FIGO 2009 staging I and its prognostic related factors in endometrial carcinoma].
Zhou J; Zhao L; Qi W; Li X; Wang J; Wei L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):776-9. PubMed ID: 25537252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The comparison of clinical and surgical-pathological staging for endometrial carcinoma].
Peng Z; Liu X; Zhang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Oct; 32(10):597-600. PubMed ID: 9642375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma of the endometrium: effect of adjuvant whole abdominal radiotherapy and pathologic parameters on outcome.
Lim P; Al Kushi A; Gilks B; Wong F; Aquino-Parsons C
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 91(4):752-7. PubMed ID: 11241243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is there a therapeutic impact to regional lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma?
Abu-Rustum NR; Iasonos A; Zhou Q; Oke E; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Chi DS; Barakat RR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 198(4):457.e1-5; discussion 457.e5-6. PubMed ID: 18395039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Practice patterns of SGO members for stage IIIA endometrial cancer.
Lee CM; Slomovitz BM; Greer M; Sharma S; Gregurich MA; Burke T; Lu KH; Ramondetta LM
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Jul; 98(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 15907988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
