672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21623557)
21. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the optimal threshold of an automated immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening: performances of immunochemical colorectal cancer screening.
Berchi C; Guittet L; Bouvier V; Launoy G
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jan; 26(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 20059780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening of colorectal cancer.
Winawer SJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):699-722. PubMed ID: 16226687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer.
Saini SD; Schoenfeld P; Vijan S
Gastroenterology; 2010 Jun; 138(7):2292-9, 2299.e1. PubMed ID: 20226186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
Inadomi JM
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S198-204. PubMed ID: 19120898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening, immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Rossum LG; van Rijn AF; Verbeek AL; van Oijen MG; Laheij RJ; Fockens P; Jansen JB; Adang EM; Dekker E
Int J Cancer; 2011 Apr; 128(8):1908-17. PubMed ID: 20589677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for gastrointestinal neoplasia: efficacy and cost of two different approaches in a clinical rehabilitation centre.
Manus B; Brägelmann R; Armbrecht U; Stolte M; Stockbrügger RW
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Feb; 5(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8664809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.
Allison JE; Sakoda LC; Levin TR; Tucker JP; Tekawa IS; Cuff T; Pauly MP; Shlager L; Palitz AM; Zhao WK; Schwartz JS; Ransohoff DF; Selby JV
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1462-70. PubMed ID: 17895475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2007 Sep; 56(36):932-6. PubMed ID: 17851446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colorectal cancer screening.
Bretthauer M
J Intern Med; 2011 Aug; 270(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 21575082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Oct; 101(20):1412-22. PubMed ID: 19779203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Colon cancer screening. Sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.
Khullar SK; DiSario JA
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1997 Jul; 7(3):365-86. PubMed ID: 9177140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness, benefit harm and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Austria.
Jahn B; Sroczynski G; Bundo M; Mühlberger N; Puntscher S; Todorovic J; Rochau U; Oberaigner W; Koffijberg H; Fischer T; Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Öfner D; Renner F; Jonas M; Hackl M; Ferlitsch M; Siebert U;
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):209. PubMed ID: 31805871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Loss of efficacy and cost-effectiveness when screening colonoscopy is performed by nongastroenterologists.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Zullo A; Cooper GS
Cancer; 2012 Sep; 118(18):4404-11. PubMed ID: 22707430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy.
O'Leary BA; Olynyk JK; Neville AM; Platell CF
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 14675241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.
Ladabaum U; Song K
Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1151-62. PubMed ID: 16230069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening.
Wilschut JA; Hol L; Dekker E; Jansen JB; Van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Habbema JD; Van Ballegooijen M
Gastroenterology; 2011 Nov; 141(5):1648-55.e1. PubMed ID: 21784045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
