These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21624179)

  • 1. Applying different genomic evaluation approaches on QTLMAS2010 dataset.
    Nadaf J; Pong-Wong R
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S9. PubMed ID: 21624179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of analyses of the QTLMAS XIV common dataset. I: genomic selection.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Wolc A; Mucha S; Szydlowski M
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1. PubMed ID: 21624165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the prior distribution of SNP effects on the estimation of total breeding value.
    Nadaf J; Riggio V; Yu TP; Pong-Wong R
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S6. PubMed ID: 22640730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
    Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of five methods for genomic breeding value estimation for the common dataset of the 15th QTL-MAS Workshop.
    Wang CL; Ma PP; Zhang Z; Ding XD; Liu JF; Fu WX; Weng ZQ; Zhang Q
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. PubMed ID: 22640547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic prediction accuracies in space and time for height and wood density of Douglas-fir using exome capture as the genotyping platform.
    Thistlethwaite FR; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; Stoehr MU; El-Kassaby YA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):930. PubMed ID: 29197325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
    Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating genomic breeding values and detecting QTL using univariate and bivariate models.
    Calus MP; Mulder HA; Veerkamp RF
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. PubMed ID: 21624175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.
    Clark SA; Hickey JM; Daetwyler HD; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Feb; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 22321529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation.
    Daetwyler HD; Swan AA; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Nov; 44(1):33. PubMed ID: 23146144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies to improve the accuracy and reduce costs of genomic prediction in aquaculture species.
    Song H; Hu H
    Evol Appl; 2022 Apr; 15(4):578-590. PubMed ID: 35505889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical note: Equivalent genomic models with a residual polygenic effect.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2016-2025. PubMed ID: 26723117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.