274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21624455)
1. A discussion of the impact of US chemical regulation legislation on the field of toxicity testing.
Sullivan K; Beck N; Sandusky C; Willett C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1231-6. PubMed ID: 21624455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).
Rovida C; Hartung T
ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):187-208. PubMed ID: 19907906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
Grindon C; Combes R
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 16555955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons learned from alternative methods and their validation for a new toxicology in the 21st century.
Hartung T
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):277-90. PubMed ID: 20574902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
Box RJ; Spielmann H
Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A replacement-first approach to toxicity testing is necessary to successfully reauthorize TSCA.
Locke PA; Myers DB
ALTEX; 2011; 28(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 22130480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.
Costa DL
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An animal protection perspective on 21st century toxicology.
Stephens ML
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):291-8. PubMed ID: 20574903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toxicology in the 21st century--working our way towards a visionary reality.
Berg N; De Wever B; Fuchs HW; Gaca M; Krul C; Roggen EL
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Jun; 25(4):874-81. PubMed ID: 21338664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing.
Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Toxicogenomics in hazard assessment of chemicals].
Kostka G; Liszewska M; Urbanek-Olejnik K
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2010; 61(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 20839457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary on ''Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy'': stem cells and cell-cell communication as fundamental targets in assessing the potential toxicity of chemicals.
Trosko JE
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 29(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 20061464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment.
Cohen Hubal EA; Richard A; Aylward L; Edwards S; Gallagher J; Goldsmith MR; Isukapalli S; Tornero-Velez R; Weber E; Kavlock R
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):299-313. PubMed ID: 20574904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fish embryo toxicity test as an animal alternative method in hazard and risk assessment and scientific research.
Embry MR; Belanger SE; Braunbeck TA; Galay-Burgos M; Halder M; Hinton DE; Léonard MA; Lillicrap A; Norberg-King T; Whale G
Aquat Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 97(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 20061034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental neurotoxicity testing: recommendations for developing alternative methods for the screening and prioritization of chemicals.
Crofton KM; Mundy WR; Lein PJ; Bal-Price A; Coecke S; Seiler AE; Knaut H; Buzanska L; Goldberg A
ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 21311847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
