164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21624646)
21. Examining the accuracy and clinical usefulness of intraoperative frozen section analysis in the management of pancreatic lesions.
Nelson DW; Blanchard TH; Causey MW; Homann JF; Brown TA
Am J Surg; 2013 May; 205(5):613-7; discussion 617. PubMed ID: 23592172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Findings of routine apical margin biopsy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Wambi CO; Patel T; Shapiro EY; Tal O; Hruby GW; Berg WT; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Jun; 23(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 23621833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Extemporaneous histological control of margins in prostatectomy for cancer].
Ponthieu A; Delgrande J; Granger F; Bonneau HP; Ivaldi A
J Urol (Paris); 1993; 99(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 7691969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Apical soft tissue biopsies predict biochemical failure in radical perineal prostatectomy patients with apical cancer involvement.
Kübler HR; Szukala SA; Madden JF; Tseng TY; Paulson DF; Vieweg J; Dahm P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 17179978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Routine intraoperative frozen section analysis of bronchial margins is of limited utility in lung cancer resection.
Owen RM; Force SD; Gal AA; Feingold PL; Pickens A; Miller DL; Fernandez FG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 95(6):1859-65; discussion 1865-6. PubMed ID: 23415238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Multiparametric MR imaging-directed intraoperative frozen-section analysis to reduce the rate of positive surgical margins.
Petralia G; Musi G; Padhani AR; Summers P; Renne G; Alessi S; Raimondi S; Matei DV; Renne SL; Jereczek-Fossa BA; De Cobelli O; Bellomi M
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):434-44. PubMed ID: 25271856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Kordan Y; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2695-701. PubMed ID: 19836759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of routine frozen section analysis of urethral margin in male patients undergoing radical cystectomy in predicting prostatic involvement.
Osman Y; Mansour A; El-Tabey N; Abdel-Latif M; Mosbah A; Hekal I; El-kappany S; Moustafa N; Shaaban A
Int Urol Nephrol; 2012 Dec; 44(6):1721-5. PubMed ID: 22965379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 11992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Miller DP; Yu J; Flanders SC; Henning JM; Stier DM; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1171-7; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
Rabbani F; Vora KC; Yunis LH; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Touijer K
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19689577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 'Mohs surgery of the prostate': the utility of in situ frozen section analysis during robotic prostatectomy.
Lavery HJ; Xiao GQ; Nabizada-Pace F; Mikulasovich M; Unger P; Samadi DB
BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(6):975-9. PubMed ID: 20880130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraoperative frozen section in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on cancer control.
Emiliozzi P; Amini M; Pansadoro A; Martini M; Pansadoro V
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2010 Dec; 82(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 21341553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
