These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21624698)
1. Superficial doses in breast cancer radiotherapy using conventional and IMRT techniques: a film-based phantom study. Almberg SS; Lindmo T; Frengen J Radiother Oncol; 2011 Aug; 100(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 21624698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer]. Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques. Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IMRT for the breast: a comparison of tangential planning techniques. Smith W; Menon G; Wolfe N; Ploquin N; Trotter T; Pudney D Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1231-41. PubMed ID: 20124651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of breathing motion on intensity modulated radiotherapy in the step-and-shoot technique: phantom measurements for irradiation of superficial target volumes. Thilmann C; Häring P; Thilmann L; Unkelbach J; Rhein B; Nill S; Huber P; Janisch E; Thieke C; Debus J Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):N117-26. PubMed ID: 16510947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contralateral breast doses measured by film dosimetry: tangential techniques and an optimized IMRT technique. Saur S; Fjellsboe LM; Lindmo T; Frengen J Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4743-58. PubMed ID: 19622854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contralateral breast dose after whole-breast irradiation: an analysis by treatment technique. Williams TM; Moran JM; Hsu SH; Marsh R; Yanke B; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2079-85. PubMed ID: 21489713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison. Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical implementation of tangential field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using sliding window technique and dosimetric comparison with 3D conformal therapy (3DCRT) in breast cancer. Selvaraj RN; Beriwal S; Pourarian RJ; Lalonde RJ; Chen A; Mehta K; Brunner G; Wagner KA; Yue NJ; Huq SM; Heron DE Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17980832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An imrt technique to increase therapeutic ratio of breast irradiation in patients with early-stage left breast cancer: limiting second malignancies. Ahmed RS; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB; Keene KS; Popple RA Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 18262126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques. Abo-Madyan Y; Polednik M; Rahn A; Schneider F; Dobler B; Wenz F; Lohr F Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18259700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation. Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16244787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric study of inverse-planed intensity modulated, forward-planned intensity modulated and conventional tangential techniques in breast conserving radiotherapy. Rongsriyam K; Rojpornpradit P; Lertbutsayanukul C; Sanghangthum T; Oonsiri S J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91(10):1571-82. PubMed ID: 18972902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Impact of skin build-up region on evaluation of irradiation plan of radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer]. Fu YC; Wang SC; Xie L Ai Zheng; 2008 Feb; 27(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 18279618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT and volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques. Johansen S; Cozzi L; Olsen DR Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 19169915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord. Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of organ-specific peripheral doses after 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional and hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer based on Monte Carlo and convolution/superposition algorithms: implications for secondary cancer risk assessment. Joosten A; Matzinger O; Jeanneret-Sozzi W; Bochud F; Moeckli R Radiother Oncol; 2013 Jan; 106(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 23351844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]