BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21625002)

  • 21. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.
    Charlesworth B; Morgan MT; Charlesworth D
    Genetics; 1993 Aug; 134(4):1289-303. PubMed ID: 8375663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection for recombination in structured populations.
    Martin G; Otto SP; Lenormand T
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):593-609. PubMed ID: 15944358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deleterious alleles in the human genome are on average younger than neutral alleles of the same frequency.
    Kiezun A; Pulit SL; Francioli LC; van Dijk F; Swertz M; Boomsma DI; van Duijn CM; Slagboom PE; van Ommen GJ; Wijmenga C; ; de Bakker PI; Sunyaev SR
    PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(2):e1003301. PubMed ID: 23468643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Otto SP
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How does epistasis influence the response to selection?
    Barton NH
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Jan; 118(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 27901509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Allele excess at neutrally evolving microsatellites and the implications for tests of neutrality.
    Schlötterer C; Kauer M; Dieringer D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Apr; 271(1541):869-74. PubMed ID: 15255107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unpacking Conditional Neutrality: Genomic Signatures of Selection on Conditionally Beneficial and Conditionally Deleterious Mutations.
    Mee JA; Yeaman S
    Am Nat; 2019 Oct; 194(4):529-540. PubMed ID: 31490722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Hill-Robertson effect and the evolution of recombination.
    Roze D; Barton NH
    Genetics; 2006 Jul; 173(3):1793-811. PubMed ID: 16702422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations.
    Guerrero RF; Rousset F; Kirkpatrick M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 367(1587):430-8. PubMed ID: 22201172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diploidy and the selective advantage for sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms.
    Kleiman M; Tannenbaum E
    Theory Biosci; 2009 Nov; 128(4):249-85. PubMed ID: 19902285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.
    Bersabé D; Caballero A; Pérez-Figueroa A; García-Dorado A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Nov; 6(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 26564947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.
    Weinreich DM; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolutionary advantage via common action of recombination and neutrality.
    Saakian DB; Hu CK
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Nov; 88(5):052717. PubMed ID: 24329306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fluctuations of fitness distributions and the rate of Muller's ratchet.
    Neher RA; Shraiman BI
    Genetics; 2012 Aug; 191(4):1283-93. PubMed ID: 22649084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamics of polygenic variability under stabilizing selection, recombination, and drift.
    Gavrilets S; Hastings A
    Genet Res; 1995 Feb; 65(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 7750747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fixation probability in a two-locus model by the ancestral recombination-selection graph.
    Lessard S; Kermany AR
    Genetics; 2012 Feb; 190(2):691-707. PubMed ID: 22095080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Weakly Deleterious Mutations and Low Rates of Recombination Limit the Impact of Natural Selection on Bacterial Genomes.
    Price MN; Arkin AP
    mBio; 2015 Dec; 6(6):e01302-15. PubMed ID: 26670382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The standard of neutrality: still flapping in the breeze?
    Proulx SR; Adler FR
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Jul; 23(7):1339-50. PubMed ID: 20492093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Coalescent size versus coalescent time with strong selection.
    Campbell RB
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Oct; 69(7):2249-59. PubMed ID: 17546476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations.
    Whitlock MC
    Genetics; 2003 Jun; 164(2):767-79. PubMed ID: 12807795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.