BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21625586)

  • 1. A general model for binary cell fate decision gene circuits with degeneracy: indeterminacy and switch behavior in the absence of cooperativity.
    Andrecut M; Halley JD; Winkler DA; Huang S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e19358. PubMed ID: 21625586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells.
    Huang S; Guo YP; May G; Enver T
    Dev Biol; 2007 May; 305(2):695-713. PubMed ID: 17412320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell commitment motif composed of progenitor-specific transcription factors and mutual-inhibition regulation.
    Wang T; Li S; Liu Y; Wang R
    IET Syst Biol; 2014 Aug; 8(4):129-37. PubMed ID: 25075525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model of sequential branching in hierarchical cell fate determination.
    Foster DV; Foster JG; Huang S; Kauffman SA
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Oct; 260(4):589-97. PubMed ID: 19615382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation.
    Wang J; Xu L; Wang E; Huang S
    Biophys J; 2010 Jul; 99(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 20655830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability and multiattractor dynamics of a toggle switch based on a two-stage model of stochastic gene expression.
    Strasser M; Theis FJ; Marr C
    Biophys J; 2012 Jan; 102(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 22225794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying Waddington landscapes and paths of non-adiabatic cell fate decisions for differentiation, reprogramming and transdifferentiation.
    Li C; Wang J
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Dec; 10(89):20130787. PubMed ID: 24132204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling Gene Networks to Understand Multistability in Stem Cells.
    Menn D; Wang X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():173-189. PubMed ID: 31062310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An enriched network motif family regulates multistep cell fate transitions with restricted reversibility.
    Ye Y; Kang X; Bailey J; Li C; Hong T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006855. PubMed ID: 30845219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A computational model for understanding stem cell, trophectoderm and endoderm lineage determination.
    Chickarmane V; Peterson C
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3478. PubMed ID: 18941526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming.
    Zhou JX; Huang S
    Trends Genet; 2011 Feb; 27(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 21146896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel generic models for differentiating stem cells reveal oscillatory mechanisms.
    Farjami S; Camargo Sosa K; Dawes JHP; Kelsh RN; Rocco A
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Oct; 18(183):20210442. PubMed ID: 34610261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling Cellular Differentiation and Reprogramming with Gene Regulatory Networks.
    Hartmann A; Ravichandran S; Del Sol A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():37-51. PubMed ID: 31062304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bifurcation dynamics and determination of alternate cell fates in bipotent progenitor cells.
    Li S; Liu Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2015 Apr; 9(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 25852780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two transcription factors, Pou4f2 and Isl1, are sufficient to specify the retinal ganglion cell fate.
    Wu F; Kaczynski TJ; Sethuramanujam S; Li R; Jain V; Slaughter M; Mu X
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(13):E1559-68. PubMed ID: 25775587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-cell analysis of mixed-lineage states leading to a binary cell fate choice.
    Olsson A; Venkatasubramanian M; Chaudhri VK; Aronow BJ; Salomonis N; Singh H; Grimes HL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7622):698-702. PubMed ID: 27580035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transition state characteristics during cell differentiation.
    Brackston RD; Lakatos E; Stumpf MPH
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Sep; 14(9):e1006405. PubMed ID: 30235202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A control-theoretical approach to the identification of a commitment switch in B lymphopoiesis cell fate determination.
    Salerno L; Cosentino C; Morrone G; Bilotta M; Amato F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():5355-8. PubMed ID: 26737501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fate-restricted retinal progenitor cells adopt a molecular profile and spatial position distinct from multipotent progenitor cells.
    Buenaventura DF; Ghinia-Tegla MG; Emerson MM
    Dev Biol; 2018 Nov; 443(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 30145104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mathematical model of mechanotransduction reveals how mechanical memory regulates mesenchymal stem cell fate decisions.
    Peng T; Liu L; MacLean AL; Wong CW; Zhao W; Nie Q
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 May; 11(1):55. PubMed ID: 28511648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.