These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21626468)

  • 1. [Influence on flux density of intraoral dental magnets during 1.5 and 3.0 tesla MRI].
    Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Boeckler A; Peroz I
    Rofo; 2011 Aug; 183(8):727-34. PubMed ID: 21626468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
    Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Alteration of flux density of highly coercive SmCo magnets used in prosthodontics and epithetics in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI].
    Truong BT; Blankenstein FH
    Radiologe; 2019 Oct; 59(10):912-919. PubMed ID: 31214744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic magnets. A study of force and field pattern, biocompatibility and clinical effects.
    Bondemark L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1994; 99():1-148. PubMed ID: 7801229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
    Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
    Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments.
    Chopra V; Smith BJ; Preiskel HW; Palmer RM; Curtis R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17378452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jun; 61(6):1887-93. PubMed ID: 24845299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The corrosion behavior of Nd2Fe14B and SmCo5 magnets.
    Kitsugi A; Okuno O; Nakano T; Hamanaka H; Kuroda T
    Dent Mater J; 1992 Dec; 11(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 1304968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets.
    Bondemark L; Kurol J; Wisten A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 May; 107(5):488-96. PubMed ID: 7733058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a neodymium-iron-boron magnet device for positioning a multi-stranded wire retainer in lingual retention--a pilot study in humans.
    Hahn W; Fricke J; Fricke-Zech S; Zapf A; Gruber R; Sadat-Khonsari R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 18687989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Force generation by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Bonds PW; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):191-4; discussion 195-6. PubMed ID: 1416238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro effect of microwave irradiation on the retentive force of magnets.
    Lemon JC; Brignoni RA; Collard SM; Martin JW; Powers JM; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 15116039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigations into the failure of dental magnets.
    Riley MA; Williams AJ; Speight JD; Walmsley AD; Harris IR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 10635193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.
    Majdani O; Leinung M; Rau T; Akbarian A; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 19041512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic displacement force and torque on dental keepers in the static magnetic field of an MR scanner.
    Omatsu M; Obata T; Minowa K; Yokosawa K; Inagaki E; Ishizaka K; Shibayama K; Yamamoto T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 40(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 24259448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of sodium fluoride and stannous fluoride on the surface roughness of intraoral magnet systems.
    Obatake RM; Collard SM; Martin J; Ladd GD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 1791570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reversing the polarity of a cochlear implant magnet after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jeon JH; Bae MR; Chang JW; Choi JY
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Aug; 39(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 21889279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.