These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21627869)

  • 41. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prescription bleaching agents may damage restorations.
    N Y State Dent J; 1995 Apr; 61(4):51. PubMed ID: 7731615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of vital tooth bleaching on solubility and roughness of dental cements.
    Londono J; Abreu A; Nelson S; Hernandez J; Torres C; Mettenburg D; Looney S; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 19703621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of temperature and in-office bleaching agents on surface and subsurface properties of aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yu H; Li Q; Wang YN; Cheng H
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1290-6. PubMed ID: 23927898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Commentary: effect of bleaching on staining susceptibility of resin composite restorative materials.
    Renne WG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):415. PubMed ID: 20002930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The post-amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 May; 13(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 12752914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Resin modified glass ionomer restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions have similar if not better retention rates than resin composites (UT CAT #628).
    Price J; Kinard S; Haveman C
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Mar; 129(3):284. PubMed ID: 22667062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):218-28. PubMed ID: 9863442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ.
    Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of current bleaching agents on the color of light-polymerized composites in vitro.
    Canay S; Cehreli MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 12806325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials.
    Rios D; Honório HM; Francisconi LF; Magalhães AC; de Andrade Moreira Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18191012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fracture resistance of resin-based composite and ceramic inlays luted to sound human teeth.
    da Silva SB; Hilgert LA; Busato AL
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):404-6. PubMed ID: 15724750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Goracci G
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 11203834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface.
    Chan DC; Lemke KC; Howell ML; Barghi N
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 8957920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Why do we polish? Part Two.
    Larson T
    Northwest Dent; 2011; 90(4):31-8. PubMed ID: 21932633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.