These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628029)

  • 1. Is the quality of endoscopic research improving? A 20-year review.
    Anwar MM; Harewood GC; Zeb F; Slattery E; Hamed MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1332-3. PubMed ID: 21628029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can scientific quality be quantified?
    Loscalzo J
    Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(9):947-50. PubMed ID: 21382902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can research quality be estimated from journal titles?
    Reeve J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):646-7. PubMed ID: 16490753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to measure science in physiology.
    Pohl U
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2008 Feb; 23():2. PubMed ID: 18268359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Result-based financing of medical research].
    Johannessen A; Erik Gilhus N
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Mar; 129(7):638-41. PubMed ID: 19337335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact factor: is it an essential tool to assess a medical journal?
    Hussain FN; Husnain A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2007 Jun; 17(6):382-3. PubMed ID: 17623598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.
    The
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jun; 3(6):e291. PubMed ID: 16749869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A negative trend of biomedical research in Libya: a bibliometric study.
    Benamer HT; Bredan A; Bakoush O
    Health Info Libr J; 2009 Sep; 26(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 19712216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The assessment of publication quality.
    Bo LL; Li JB; Deng XM
    Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1589-90; author reply 1590. PubMed ID: 18420890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low impact factor of Italian journals: another aspect of the poor research funding?
    Ugolini D; Garrucciu R
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 41(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 15737550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The counting house.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical appraisal of qualitative research in clinical journals challenged.
    Sale JE; Hawker GA
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Apr; 53(2):314-6. PubMed ID: 15818641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Research in gastroenterology in Argentina: a species to protect].
    Rodríguez C; Mastai R
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2005; 35(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 16127982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On judgment, impact factor and feelings: what can we learn from the impact factor?
    Fatović-Ferencić S
    Croat Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(3):344-5. PubMed ID: 15190920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating research in cardiovascular medicine: citation counts are not sufficient.
    McAlister FA; Lawson FM; Good AH; Armstrong PW
    Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(9):1038-43. PubMed ID: 21382905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Presence of the biomedical periodicals of Hungarian editions in international databases].
    Vasas L; Hercsel I
    Orv Hetil; 2006 Jan; 147(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16509216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Painful publishing.
    Raff M; Johnson A; Walter P
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5885):36. PubMed ID: 18599755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of future citations of a research paper from number of its internet downloads.
    Jahandideh S; Abdolmaleki P; Asadabadi EB
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(2):458-9. PubMed ID: 17360128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'Ding dong the witch is dead!' the demise of the research quality framework.
    Happell B
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Apr; 17(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 18307595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.