These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628110)
1. New rules proposed for power plant toxics. Weinhold B Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Jun; 119(6):A245. PubMed ID: 21628110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of Regulating Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal and Oil-Fired Utilities in the United States. Sunderland EM; Driscoll CT; Hammitt JK; Grandjean P; Evans JS; Blum JD; Chen CY; Evers DC; Jaffe DA; Mason RP; Goho S; Jacobs W Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2117-20. PubMed ID: 26848613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Air pollution ignores state borders. Cooper R N C Med J; 2013; 74(5):396-7. PubMed ID: 24165766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Obama's Clean Power Plan: a breath of fresh air. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine Lancet Respir Med; 2015 Sep; 3(9):661. PubMed ID: 26321047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mercury Pollution from Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Critical Analysis of the Australian Regulatory Response to Public Health Risks. Bramwell G; Wilson F; Faunce T J Law Med; 2018 Dec; 26(2):480-487. PubMed ID: 30574731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Health Impacts of Environmental Policy: The North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Act. Kravchenko J; Lyerly HK; Ross W N C Med J; 2018; 79(5):329-333. PubMed ID: 30228143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Clean Air Act: Substantial Success and the Challenges Ahead. Greenbaum DS Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2018 Mar; 15(3):296-297. PubMed ID: 29262262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pollution portrait: the fourth National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment. Weinhold B Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Jun; 119(6):A255-7. PubMed ID: 21628119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The clean air act deserves our full support. Benjamin GC Am J Public Health; 2011 Dec; 101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 22021309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units. Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combating EPA Rollbacks - Health Care's Response to a Retreat on Climate. McCarthy G; Bernstein A N Engl J Med; 2019 Aug; 381(8):696-698. PubMed ID: 31340115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The World Bank must clean up its act. Ramachandran V Nature; 2019 Mar; 567(7748):285. PubMed ID: 30890809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Trump Administration and the Environment - Heed the Science. Samet JM; Burke TA; Goldstein BD N Engl J Med; 2017 Mar; 376(12):1182-1188. PubMed ID: 28249122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The sustained undermining of science by the EPA's leaders is a travesty. Nature; 2020 May; 581(7806):7-8. PubMed ID: 32372045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving NO(x) cap-and-trade system with adjoint-based emission exchange rates. Mesbah SM; Hakami A; Schott S Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(21):11905-12. PubMed ID: 23050674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental economics. An economic perspective on the EPA's Clean Power Plan. Fowlie M; Goulder L; Kotchen M; Borenstein S; Bushnell J; Davis L; Greenstone M; Kolstad C; Knittel C; Stavins R; Wara M; Wolak F; Wolfram C Science; 2014 Nov; 346(6211):815-6. PubMed ID: 25395524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]