147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628305)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis.
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin M; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Aug; 66(8):1906-15. PubMed ID: 21628305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin vs fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.
Neoh CF; Senol E; Kara A; Dinleyici EC; Turner SJ; Kong DCM
Mycoses; 2017 Nov; 60(11):714-722. PubMed ID: 28699297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of anidulafungin in confirmed candidaemia and other invasive Candida infections in Spain.
Grau S; Salavert M; Carlos Pozo Laderas J; García Vargas M; Barrueta JA; Mir N
J Mycol Med; 2013 Sep; 23(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 23849341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic evaluation of micafungin vs. liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC).
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin MA; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
Mycoses; 2013 Sep; 56(5):532-42. PubMed ID: 23496163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis.
Auzinger G; Playford EG; Graham CN; Knox HN; Weinstein D; Kantecki M; Schlamm H; Charbonneau C
BMC Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 15():463. PubMed ID: 26503366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis.
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin MA; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
Intern Med J; 2013 Jun; 43(6):668-77. PubMed ID: 23461421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resource utilization and cost of treatment with anidulafungin or fluconazole for candidaemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: focus on critically ill patients.
Reboli AC; Rotstein C; Kett DH; Maschio M; Cartier S; Chambers R; Tarallo M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):705-17. PubMed ID: 21591820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species.
Ou HT; Lee TY; Chen YC; Charbonneau C
BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Jul; 17(1):481. PubMed ID: 28693479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Korea.
Sohn HS; Lee TJ; Kim J; Kim D
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1105-15; discussion 1066-8. PubMed ID: 19539111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Schonfeld W; Wang Cheng J; Tong KB; Seifeldin R
Clin Ther; 2008 May; 30(5):964-73. PubMed ID: 18555943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin as definitive therapy for candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.
Neoh CF; Senol E; Kara A; Dinleyici EC; Turner SJ; Kong DCM
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Mar; 37(3):537-544. PubMed ID: 29185089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. De-escalation from micafungin is a cost-effective alternative to traditional escalation from fluconazole in the treatment of patients with systemic Candida infections.
Masterton RG; Casamayor M; Musingarimi P; van Engen A; Zinck R; Odufowora-Sita O; Odeyemi IA
J Med Econ; 2013 Nov; 16(11):1344-56. PubMed ID: 24003830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anidulafungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis.
Mayr A; Aigner M; Lass-Flörl C
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 Mar; 17 Suppl 1():1-12. PubMed ID: 21251147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of de-escalation from micafungin versus escalation from fluconazole for invasive candidiasis in China.
Chen D; Wan X; Kruger E; Chen C; Yue X; Wang L; Wu J
J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):301-307. PubMed ID: 29303621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis.
Reboli AC; Rotstein C; Pappas PG; Chapman SW; Kett DH; Kumar D; Betts R; Wible M; Goldstein BP; Schranz J; Krause DS; Walsh TJ;
N Engl J Med; 2007 Jun; 356(24):2472-82. PubMed ID: 17568028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost and resource utilization associated with fluconazole as first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis: a retrospective database analysis.
Craver CW; Tarallo M; Roberts CS; Blanchette CM; Ernst FR
Clin Ther; 2010 Dec; 32(14):2467-77. PubMed ID: 21353115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Echinocandins in the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis: clinical and economic perspectives.
Neoh CF; Slavin M; Chen SC; Stewart K; Kong DC
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Mar; 43(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 24670423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, double-blind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis.
Krause DS; Simjee AE; van Rensburg C; Viljoen J; Walsh TJ; Goldstein BP; Wible M; Henkel T
Clin Infect Dis; 2004 Sep; 39(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 15472806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis.
Kett DH; Shorr AF; Reboli AC; Reisman AL; Biswas P; Schlamm HT
Crit Care; 2011; 15(5):R253. PubMed ID: 22026929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.
Neoh CF; Senol E; Kara A; Dinleyici EC; Turner SJ; Kong DCM
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Sep; 37(9):1777-1784. PubMed ID: 29959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
