These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628682)

  • 41. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth.
    Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Restorative treatment on Class I and II restorations in primary molars: a survey of Brazilian dental schools.
    Motisuki C; Lima LM; dos Santos-Pinto L; Guelmann M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 30(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 16491976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Next generation of dentists moving to amalgam-free dentistry: Survey of posterior restorations teaching in North America.
    Zabrovsky A; Neeman Levy T; Bar-On H; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 Aug; 23(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 31009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Class IV resin composite restoration: results of a national survey.
    Potoky JR; Rothfuss LG
    Gen Dent; 1993; 41(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 23087953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Teaching approaches in South African dental schools: direct restorative procedures.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG; Gugushe TS
    SADJ; 2009 Feb; 64(1):16, 18-20. PubMed ID: 19418898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Handling characteristics of resin composites in posterior teeth.
    Ferrari M; Kugel G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 Sep; 19(9):879-82, 884, 886 passim; quiz 894. PubMed ID: 9852801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Restoring class II cavities with composite resin, utilising the bulk filling technique.
    Lally U
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 24812757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Practical posterior composites. Efficient placement and predictable results.
    Griffin JD
    Dent Today; 2003 Feb; 22(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 12680270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The transition from amalgam to other restorative materials in the U.S. predoctoral pediatric dentistry clinics.
    Kateeb ET; Warren JJ
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Aug; 5(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 31452952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Posterior composites: a practical guide revisited.
    Mackenzie L; Burke FJ; Shortall AC
    Dent Update; 2012 Apr; 39(3):211-2, 215-6. PubMed ID: 22675892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Direct posterior composites: a practical guide.
    Mackenzie L; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2009 Mar; 36(2):71-2, 74-6, 79-80 passim. PubMed ID: 19388389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM; Manso MC; Gavinha S; Melo P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Functional and aesthetic guidelines for stress-reduced direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 22816500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Placement of posterior composite restorations in United Kingdom dental practices: techniques, problems, and attitudes.
    Gilmour AS; Latif M; Addy LD; Lynch CD
    Int Dent J; 2009 Jun; 59(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 19637523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Repair versus replacement of defective direct composite restorations in teaching programmes in United Kingdom and Irish Dental Schools.
    Blum IR; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 12526271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.