These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628682)

  • 61. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Challenges to teaching posterior composites in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2006 Dec; 201(12):747-50. PubMed ID: 17183386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Expediting Class II posterior composite placement.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):96-8, 100-1. PubMed ID: 11665424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success.
    Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 11499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Survey of United States dental schools on cementation protocols for implant crown restorations.
    Tarica DY; Alvarado VM; Truong ST
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):68-79. PubMed ID: 20141811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 2. Cavity preparation.
    van der Vyver PJ; Bridges PN
    SADJ; 2002 May; 57(5):174-80. PubMed ID: 12174713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Esthetic dentistry in North American dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Abu-Hanna A; Mjör IA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 70(4):230. PubMed ID: 15120016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Direct resin composites for 2002 and beyond.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 12029793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Posterior composites: the future for restoring posterior teeth?
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent J; 2014 May; 3(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 25215342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Onal B; Pamir T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1547-55. PubMed ID: 16329418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers.
    Lynch CD; Shortall AC; Stewardson D; Tomson PL; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2007 Aug; 203(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 17721472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Achieving natural aesthetics with direct resin composites: predictable clinical protocol.
    Koczarski MJ
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 17(8):523-5. PubMed ID: 16323456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Facilitating reproduction of occlusal anatomy of posterior composite restorations: the mini-matrix.
    Leni F
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 13(7):539-44; quiz 546. PubMed ID: 11685833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.