These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628727)

  • 1. The reliance on visual feedback for online and offline processing.
    Lawrence GP; Khan MA; Mourton S; Bernier PM
    Motor Control; 2011 Apr; 15(2):232-46. PubMed ID: 21628727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude.
    Khan MA; Lawrence G; Fourkas A; Franks IM; Elliott D; Pembroke S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 May; 113(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 12679045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction.
    Khan MA; Lawrence GP; Franks IM; Buckolz E
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 15127170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utilization of visual feedback in the control of movement direction: evidence from a video aiming task.
    Khan MA; Lawrence GP; Franks IM; Elliott D
    Motor Control; 2003 Jul; 7(3):290-303. PubMed ID: 12893959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of state anxiety on the online and offline control of fast target-directed movements.
    Lawrence GP; Khan MA; Hardy L
    Psychol Res; 2013 Jul; 77(4):422-33. PubMed ID: 22622437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies.
    Mackrous I; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 17618424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues.
    Robin C; Toussaint L; Blandin Y; Proteau L
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Sep; 37(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 16120563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specificity versus variability: effects of practice conditions on the use of afferent information for manual aiming.
    Tremblay L; Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Motor Control; 2001 Oct; 5(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 11581504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data.
    Khan MA; Franks IM; Elliott D; Lawrence GP; Chua R; Bernier PM; Hansen S; Weeks DJ
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2006; 30(8):1106-21. PubMed ID: 16839604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory integration in the learning of an aiming task.
    Proteau L
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1995 Mar; 49(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 9341308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability.
    Cheng DT; Luis M; Tremblay L
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 18560814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly.
    Seidler-Dobrin RD; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 119(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 9588781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing the use of vision in manual aiming: the role of practice.
    Elliott D; Chua R; Pollock BJ; Lyons J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 7754087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there "feedback" during visual imagery? Evidence from a specificity of practice paradigm.
    Krigolson O; Van Gyn G; Tremblay L; Heath M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Mar; 60(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16615715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the production of component submovements.
    Khan MA; Franks IM
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Sep; 35(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 12873843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics?
    Mackrous I; Proteau L
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):223-32. PubMed ID: 24874948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginally perceptible outcome feedback, motor learning and implicit processes.
    Masters RS; Maxwell JP; Eves FF
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):639-45. PubMed ID: 19375946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent visual feedback and spatial accuracy in continuous aiming movements.
    Sherwood DE; Rothman KK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):825-39. PubMed ID: 22403928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of practice on component submovements is dependent on the availability of visual feedback.
    Khan MA; Franks IM
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Sep; 32(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 10975271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using concurrent visual feedback to focus attention in bimanual aiming movements.
    Sherwood DE; Kaiser A
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2002 Dec; 73(4):478-84. PubMed ID: 12495251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.