These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21628748)

  • 1. [Toward a comparative effectiveness policy in Italy].
    Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 21628748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What can epidemiology contribute to comparative effectiveness research?
    Chubak J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 Mar; 67(3):206-7. PubMed ID: 23180807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing appropriate comparators.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):811-2. PubMed ID: 20630329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodology for comparative effectiveness research: potential and limitations.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4185-7. PubMed ID: 23071226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing treatment effects in the "real world".
    Jones AS; Shinogle JA
    Clin Ther; 2010 Oct; 32(11):1952-3. PubMed ID: 21095489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials.
    Lauer MS
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(25):3051-3. PubMed ID: 23055180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology: an overview.
    Lyman GH; Levine M
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4181-4. PubMed ID: 23071249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metabias: a challenge for comparative effectiveness research.
    Goodman S; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 21727295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of national guidelines for network meta-analysis.
    Laws A; Kendall R; Hawkins N
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):642-54. PubMed ID: 25128059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Promoting Informed Decision Making for Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trials.
    Weiss EM; Joffe S
    JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Sep; 169(9):803-4. PubMed ID: 26147046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative-effectiveness research in cataract and refractive surgery: the CATT call.
    Dupps WJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1569-70. PubMed ID: 21855755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed.
    Soumerai SB; Starr D; Majumdar SR
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E101. PubMed ID: 26111157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiology, comparative effectiveness research, and the National Institutes of Health: forces for health.
    Lauer MS; Hodes R
    Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):625-8. PubMed ID: 21811109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
    Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectations for comparative effectiveness and efficacy research: with welcomed questions may come unwelcome answers.
    Eaglstein WH; Kirsner RS
    JAMA Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 149(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 23324750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Challenges in designing comparative-effectiveness trials for antidepressants.
    Leon AC
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Feb; 91(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 22261683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
    Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing comparative effectiveness of new drugs before approval using prospective network meta-analyses.
    Naci H; O'Connor AB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):812-6. PubMed ID: 23810022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.