353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21630183)
1. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Valentin L; Bergelin I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second trimester cervical length measurements with transvaginal ultrasound: A prospective observational agreement and reliability study.
Kuusela P; Wennerholm UB; Fadl H; Wesström J; Lindgren P; Hagberg H; Jacobsson B; Valentin L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1476-1485. PubMed ID: 32392356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of reliability between uterocervical angle and cervical length measurements by various experienced operators using transvaginal ultrasound.
Pruksanusak N; Sawaddisan R; Kor-Anantakul O; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Geater A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Apr; 33(8):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 30176754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of cervix elastography in the late first and second trimester of pregnancy.
Fruscalzo A; Schmitz R; Klockenbusch W; Steinhard J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E101-E107. PubMed ID: 22623133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15959922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical length in late second and third trimesters: a mixture model for predicting delivery.
Souka AP; Papastefanou I; Papadopoulos G; Chrelias C; Kassanos D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 24817155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement.
Farrell T; Cairns M; Leslie J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 12858303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 16388513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation Between Cervical Lengths Measured by Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography for Predicting Preterm Birth.
Cho HJ; Roh HJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Mar; 35(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 26892824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical implications of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6-9 weeks' gestation.
Pexsters A; Luts J; Van Schoubroeck D; Bottomley C; Van Calster B; Van Huffel S; Abdallah Y; D'Hooghe T; Lees C; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 21077156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of transvaginal Doppler velocimetry measurements in the uterine arteries of postmenopausal women.
Tekay A; Järvelä I; Jouppila P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 10(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 9339527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques.
Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women.
Epstein E; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 20(5):486-91. PubMed ID: 12423487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Predictive value of cervical length by transvaginal sonography for preterm pregnancy during mid- and late-trimester of pregnancy].
Qu SH; Shi CY; Chen Q; Chen JY; Sun WJ; Sun Y; Zhang XX; Fan LX; Yang HX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 22321348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor.
Gauthier T; Marin B; Garuchet-Bigot A; Kanoun D; Catalan C; Caly H; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 24728104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel algorithm for computer-assisted measurement of cervical length from transvaginal ultrasound images.
Wu M; Fraser RF; Chen CW
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2004 Sep; 8(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 15484439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
