354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21630183)
21. Intra- and interobserver agreement on cervical volume and flow indices during pregnancy using transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography and Doppler angiography.
Basgul A; Kavak ZN; Bakirci N; Gokaslan H
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(6):256-61. PubMed ID: 17566567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound cervical length.
Gascón A; Goya M; Mendoza M; Gracia-Perez-Bonfils A; Higueras T; Calero I; Avilés M; Sánchez MA; Llurba E; Cabero L; Carreras E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jan; 33(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 30198351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements.
Goldberg J; Newman RB; Rust PF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 9369833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of an ultrasonic method to detect cervical remodeling in vivo in full-term pregnant women.
McFarlin BL; Balash J; Kumar V; Bigelow TA; Pombar X; Abramowicz JS; O'Brien WD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2533-9. PubMed ID: 26004670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization of the cervix - A new predictor for prematurity?].
Tekesin I; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Sierra F; Schmidt S
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2002; 206(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 12098823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability of the sonographic evaluation for cervical length and elastography with pelvic parameters in term pregnancy by experienced operators with varying levels of experience.
Sawaddisan R; Khwankaew N; Pruksanusak N; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Pranpanus S; Petpichetchian C; Suksai M; Chainarong N
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):333-342. PubMed ID: 38247164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intra- and inter-observer variability of evaluation of uterine cervix elastography images during pregnancy.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z; Preis K
Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 25011217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability.
Burger M; Weber-Rössler T; Willmann M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 9(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 9165682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.
Molina FS; Gómez LF; Florido J; Padilla MC; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 22173854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Progressive cervical length changes versus single cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound for prediction of preterm delivery.
Dilek TU; Yazici G; Gurbuz A; Tasdelen B; Gulhan S; Dilek B; Dilek S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2007; 64(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 17664877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Non-Compressive Transvaginal Cervical Elastography as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Pregnancy: A Repeatability and Reliability Analysis.
Janssen MK; Koelper N; Weatherby M; Werth C; Schwartz N
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 37732906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of third trimester uterine artery pulsatility index.
Marchi L; Gaini C; Franchi C; Mecacci F; Bilardo C; Pasquini L
Prenat Diagn; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28960414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate.
Stamilio D; Carlson LM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):739-743.e1. PubMed ID: 27888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy.
Tsakiridis I; Mamopoulos A; Athanasiadis A; Dagklis T
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 58(6):784-787. PubMed ID: 31759527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation.
Songserm V; Komwilaisak R; Saksiriwuttho P; Kongwattanakul K
J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 Sep; 47(7):389-393. PubMed ID: 31245845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Current clinical implications of transvaginal ultrasound measurement of the cervix during pregnancy].
Kayem G; Cabrol D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Feb; 31(1 Suppl):2S48-55. PubMed ID: 11973520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population.
Matijevic R; Grgic O; Knezevic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Oct; 111(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 20615503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history.
Heath VC; Southall TR; Souka AP; Novakov A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 9819867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sonographic Measurement of Cervical Volume in Pregnant Women at High Risk of Preterm Birth Using a Geometric Formula for a Frustum Versus 3-Dimensional Automated Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis.
Ahmed AI; Aldhaheri SR; Rodriguez-Kovacs J; Narasimhulu D; Putra M; Minkoff H; Haberman S
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Nov; 36(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 28586106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
