BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21630187)

  • 1. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study.
    Kehl S; Schmidt U; Spaich S; Schild RL; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 21898638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different sonographic methods to determine fetal abdominal circumference.
    Kehl S; Zaiss I; Freiburg F; Speierer A; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 28(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 20881366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas.
    Hasenoehrl G; Pohlhammer A; Gruber R; Staudach A; Steiner H
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Dec; 30(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 19544232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?
    Hoopmann M; Bernau B; Hart N; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20091464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
    Schmidt U; Temerinac D; Bildstein K; Tuschy B; Mayer J; Sütterlin M; Siemer J; Kehl S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Sonographic Weight Estimation Formula for Fetuses with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.
    Faschingbauer F; Mayr A; Geipel A; Gembruch U; Dammer U; Raabe E; Beckmann MW; Kehl S; Schild RL; Siemer J; Schmid M
    Ultraschall Med; 2015 Jun; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 24927106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.
    Mattsson N; Rosendahl H; Luukkaala T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 17520400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels.
    Siemer J; Egger N; Hart N; Meurer B; Müller A; Dathe O; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17602369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sonographic weight estimation in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
    Faschingbauer F; Geipel A; Gembruch U; Voigt F; Dammer U; Beckmann MW; Schild RL; Kehl S; Schmid M; Mayr A; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Dec; 34(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 23143882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation.
    Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Schneider M; Faschingbauer C; Schmid M; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Kehl S; Mayr A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 25870017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Schild RL; Fimmers R; Hansmann M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 16(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 11169329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound.
    Schild RL; Sachs C; Fimmers R; Gembruch U; Hansmann M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 14970995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased accuracy of fetal weight estimation with a gender-specific weight formula.
    Siemer J; Wolf T; Hart N; Schrauder M; Meurer B; Goecker T; Beckmann MW; Schild RL
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 18836268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
    Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.