These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21631591)

  • 1. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation.
    Vera C; De Kok IJ; Reinhold D; Limpiphipatanakorn P; Yap AK; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1514-9. PubMed ID: 23189304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of linear measurements around dental implants by means of cone beam computed tomography with different exposure parameters.
    Bohner LOL; Tortamano P; Marotti J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160377. PubMed ID: 28267928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement.
    Fatemitabar SA; Nikgoo A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 20556248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic value of dental implants in the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography].
    Fan LF; Pan XG; Pu YP; Lai HC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 18989602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Buccal Bone Surrounding Dental Implants Using a High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner.
    Bohner L; Habor D; Tortamano P; Radermacher K; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 30940417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurement from cone beam computed tomography compared with histologic analysis.
    Tanaka Y; Dutra V; Lin WS; Levon J; Hamada Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 34756426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior Maxillary Teeth: Relevance to Immediate Implant Placement.
    Gakonyo J; Mohamedali AJ; Mungure EK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):880-887. PubMed ID: 30025005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
    Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of peri-implant facial bone following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 1-year cone beam computed tomography study.
    Roe P; Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Caruso JM; Zimmerman G; Mesquida J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 22442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
    Bornstein MM; Balsiger R; Sendi P; von Arx T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21039896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Location and classification of Canalis sinuosus for cone beam computed tomography: avoiding misdiagnosis.
    Manhães Júnior LR; Villaça-Carvalho MF; Moraes ME; Lopes SL; Silva MB; Junqueira JL
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30(1):e49. PubMed ID: 27119586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between buccal and alveolar bone widths at the central incisors according to cone-beam-computed tomography.
    Uner DD; Izol BS; Gorus Z
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 30666024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.