These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21631591)
21. Buccal bone plate in the immediately placed and restored maxillary single implant: a 7-year retrospective study using computed tomography. Degidi M; Nardi D; Daprile G; Piattelli A Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22228461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement. Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study. Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters. Fu JH; Oh TJ; Benavides E; Rudek I; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 23594026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Braut V; Bornstein MM; Belser U; Buser D Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 21491011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery. Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 27444713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study. Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. Chen LC; Lundgren T; Hallström H; Cherel F J Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 18315421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible. Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Loubele M; Van Assche N; Carpentier K; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 17900939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review. Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-Dimensional buccal bone anatomy and aesthetic outcome of single dental implants replacing maxillary incisors. Veltri M; Ekestubbe A; Abrahamsson I; Wennström JL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):956-63. PubMed ID: 26178908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Changes in alveolar bone width around maxillary implants, as determined through cone beam computed tomography based on bony landmarks: A preliminary study. Lin SW; Hu KF; Lin YC; Liu PF; Chou YH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):861-870. PubMed ID: 37259681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure. Yepes JF; Al-Sabbagh M Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 59(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 25434558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Angulations of Anterior Teeth With Reference to the Alveolar Bone Measured by CBCT in a Chinese Population. Zhang S; Shi X; Liu H Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 26057779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of horizontal periodontal bone defects: an in vivo study. Feijo CV; Lucena JG; Kurita LM; Pereira SL Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Oct; 32(5):e162-8. PubMed ID: 22754909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Patcas R; Müller L; Ullrich O; Peltomäki T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22196184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Sun Z; Smith T; Kortam S; Kim DG; Tee BC; Fields H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e117-27. PubMed ID: 21300222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]