These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21631591)

  • 41. Facial Alveolar Bone Width at the First and Second Maxillary Premolars in Healthy Patients: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Rojo-Sanchis J; Viña-Almunia J; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Aug; 43(4):261-265. PubMed ID: 28421873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomographic measurements of the bone labial and palatal to the maxillary anterior teeth.
    Behnia H; Motamedian SR; Kiani MT; Morad G; Khojasteh A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1249-55. PubMed ID: 26478968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of buccal bone coverage in the anterior region by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ferreira PP; Torres M; Campos PS; Vogel CJ; de Araújo TM; Rebello IM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):698-704. PubMed ID: 24182586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
    Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
    Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A 10-Year Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Observation of the Buccal Bony Wall of an Immediately Placed Implant at the Anterior Maxilla: A Case Report.
    Jung J; Noh K; Al-Nawas B; Kwon YD
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Jun; 44(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 29090970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The outcome of oral implants placed in bone with limited bucco-oral dimensions: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Temmerman A; Keestra JA; Coucke W; Teughels W; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Mar; 42(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25682801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography in Measuring Thinning Oral and Buccal Bone.
    Raskó Z; Nagy L; Radnai M; Piffkó J; Baráth Z
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 26645480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-dimensional vs 3-dimensional comparison of alveolar bone over maxillary incisors with A-point as a reference.
    Kula TJ; Ghoneima A; Eckert G; Parks ET; Utreja A; Kula K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Dec; 152(6):836-847.e2. PubMed ID: 29173863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Buccal and palatal alveolar bone dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A micro-CT study.
    Todorovic VS; Postma TC; Hoffman J; van Zyl AW
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 36596566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Objective and subjective image evaluation of maxillary alveolar bone based on cone beam computed tomography exposure parameters.
    de Moura PM; Hallac RR; Seaward JR; Kane AA; Aguiar M; Raggio R; Gutfilen B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):557-65. PubMed ID: 27068313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Buccal bone thickness assessment for immediate anterior dental implant planning: A pilot study comparing cone-beam computed tomography and 3D double-echo steady-state MRI.
    Al-Haj Husain A; Stadlinger B; Özcan M; Schönegg D; Winklhofer S; Al-Haj Husain N; Piccirelli M; Valdec S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 36454235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study.
    Veyre-Goulet S; Fortin T; Thierry A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 18384410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.
    Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
    Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
    Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Kurt Bayrakdar S; Orhan K; Bayrakdar IS; Bilgir E; Ezhov M; Gusarev M; Shumilov E
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 34011314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.