These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21635166)

  • 1. The response AC/A ratio: differences between inducing and relaxing accommodation at different distances of fixation.
    Pankhania SR; Firth AY
    Strabismus; 2011 Jun; 19(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 21635166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of altering spherical aberration on the static accommodative response.
    Theagarayan B; Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Calver RI; Rae SM; O'Leary DJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 19154282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical note: effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 18201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a monocular pupillometer and the pupillometry function of a binocular free-viewing autorefractor.
    Bradley JC; Cohn CD; Wu PW; Brown SM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jul; 37(7):1257-62. PubMed ID: 21601418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.
    Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D
    Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 19390469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-linearity of the response accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.
    Johnston MS; Firth AY
    Strabismus; 2013 Sep; 21(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 23978145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binocular adaptation to near addition lenses in emmetropic adults.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1262-9. PubMed ID: 18395768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fixation disparity and accommodation as a function of viewing distance and prism load.
    Jaschinski W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jul; 17(4):324-39. PubMed ID: 9390377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aberration control and vision training as an effective means of improving accommodation in individuals with myopia.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; Rae S; Calver RI; Theagarayan BP; Nelson P; Osuobeni E; Sailoganathan A; Price H; O'Leary DJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5120-9. PubMed ID: 19643961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accommodative response during distance optometric test procedures.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ; Rosen J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Sep; 63(9):614-8. PubMed ID: 1430751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical near gradient stimulus AC/A ratio correlates better with the response CA/C ratio than with the response AC/A ratio.
    Horwood AM; Riddell PM
    Strabismus; 2013 Jun; 21(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 23713939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical exhibition of increased accommodative loads for binocular fusion in patients with basic intermittent exotropia.
    Ha SG; Jang SM; Cho YA; Kim SH; Song JS; Suh YW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 16():77. PubMed ID: 27266700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.
    Escalante JB; Rosenfield M
    Optometry; 2006 May; 77(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 16651213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of prism adaptation on the response AC/A ratio.
    Rainey BB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 May; 20(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 10897341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of the accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio: linear and nonlinear static models.
    Hung GK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Apr; 44(4):306-16. PubMed ID: 9125813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgery for esotropia with a high accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio: effects on accommodative vergence and binocularity.
    Arnoldi KA; Tychsen L
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1996 May; 27(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 8860599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.