These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21635299)

  • 1. Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Aguado-Orea J; Gobet F
    Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 31(2):311-41. PubMed ID: 21635299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the Development of Children's Use of Optional Infinitives in Dutch and English Using MOSAIC.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Gobet F
    Cogn Sci; 2006 Mar; 30(2):277-310. PubMed ID: 21702816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model.
    Freudenthal D; Pine J; Gobet F
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):643-69. PubMed ID: 20334719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of Optional Infinitive errors in children's declaratives and Wh- questions.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Jones G; Gobet F
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():61-76. PubMed ID: 26114904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Building a unified model of the Optional Infinitive Stage: Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of verb-marking error in typically developing children and children with Developmental Language Disorder.
    Pine JM; Freudenthal D; Gobet F
    J Child Lang; 2023 Nov; 50(6):1336-1352. PubMed ID: 36814394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The input ambiguity hypothesis and case blindness: an account of cross-linguistic and intra-linguistic differences in case errors.
    Pelham SD
    J Child Lang; 2011 Mar; 38(2):235-72. PubMed ID: 20202289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia.
    Bastiaanse R; Edwards S
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 15010241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facilitating vocabulary acquisition of young English language learners.
    Lugo-Neris MJ; Jackson CW; Goldstein H
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2010 Jul; 41(3):314-27. PubMed ID: 20421611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech-language pathologists' assessment and intervention practices with multilingual children.
    Williams CJ; McLeod S
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Jun; 14(3):292-305. PubMed ID: 22472031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological acquisition in bilingual Spanish-English speaking children.
    Fabiano-Smith L; Goldstein BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):160-78. PubMed ID: 20150407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The logical syntax of number words: theory, acquisition and processing.
    Musolino J
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 19217616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development.
    McCauley SM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Jan; 126(1):1-51. PubMed ID: 30604987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cross-linguistic examination of the noun-category bias: its existence and specificity in French- and Spanish-speaking preschool-aged children.
    Waxman SR; Senghas A; Benveniste S
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Apr; 32(3):183-218. PubMed ID: 9125905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese.
    Goswami U; Wang HL; Cruz A; Fosker T; Mead N; Huss M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):325-37. PubMed ID: 20146613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading acquisition, AAC and the transferability of english research to languages with more consistent or transparent orthographies.
    Erickson K; Sachse S
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Sep; 26(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 20874080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-language activation in children's speech production: evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals.
    Poarch GJ; van Hell JG
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Mar; 111(3):419-38. PubMed ID: 22138311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Input, innateness, and induction in language acquisition.
    Morgan JL
    Dev Psychobiol; 1990 Nov; 23(7):661-78. PubMed ID: 2286297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax.
    Theakston AL; Lieven EV; Pine JM; Rowland CF
    J Child Lang; 2004 Feb; 31(1):61-99. PubMed ID: 15053085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?
    Hutzler F; Ziegler JC; Perry C; Wimmer H; Zorzi M
    Cognition; 2004 Apr; 91(3):273-96. PubMed ID: 15168898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning.
    Jarosz G
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):565-606. PubMed ID: 20307347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.