202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21637086)
1. Comparisons of screening colonoscopy performed by a nurse practitioner and gastroenterologists: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Limoges-Gonzalez M; Mann NS; Al-Juburi A; Tseng D; Inadomi J; Rossaro L
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2011; 34(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 21637086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colonoscopy training for nurse endoscopists: a feasibility study.
Koornstra JJ; Corporaal S; Giezen-Beintema WM; de Vries SE; van Dullemen HM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):688-95. PubMed ID: 19251011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The views of gastroenterologists about the role of nurse endoscopists, especially in colorectal cancer screening.
van Putten PG; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Apr; 29(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 19183151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse endoscopists perform colonoscopies according to the international standard and with high patient satisfaction.
van Putten PG; Ter Borg F; Adang RP; Koornstra JJ; Romberg-Camps MJ; Timmer R; Poen AC; Kuipers EJ; Van Leerdam ME
Endoscopy; 2012 Dec; 44(12):1127-32. PubMed ID: 22930175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized, controlled trial to assess a novel colorectal cancer screening strategy: the conversion strategy--a comparison of sequential sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy with immediate conversion from sigmoidoscopy to colonoscopy in patients with an abnormal screening sigmoidoscopy.
Stern MA; Fendrick AM; McDonnell WM; Gunaratnam N; Moseley R; Chey WD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Aug; 95(8):2074-9. PubMed ID: 10950060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.
Patel VB; Nahar R; Murray B; Salner AL
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 23691732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loss of efficacy and cost-effectiveness when screening colonoscopy is performed by nongastroenterologists.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Zullo A; Cooper GS
Cancer; 2012 Sep; 118(18):4404-11. PubMed ID: 22707430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: are we actually adhering to the guidelines?
Walker AS; Nelson DW; Fowler JJ; Causey MW; Quade S; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Steele SR
Am J Surg; 2013 May; 205(5):618-22; discussion 622. PubMed ID: 23592173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates.
Peters SL; Hasan AG; Jacobson NB; Austin GL
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May; 8(5):439-42. PubMed ID: 20117245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Screening colonoscopy among persons 50 to 60 years of age with and without familial risk of colorectal cancer - a prospective multicenter trial].
Sieg A; Für Die BNG-Studiengruppe
Z Gastroenterol; 2003 Nov; 41(11):1077-82. PubMed ID: 14648376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Opening doors for nonphysician colonoscopists.
Limoges-Gonzalez M
Nurse Pract; 2012 Feb; 37(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 22252027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fellowship Colonoscopy Training and Preparedness for Independent Gastroenterology Practice.
Patwardhan VR; Feuerstein JD; Sengupta N; Lewandowski JJ; Tsao R; Kothari D; Anastopoulos HT; Doyle RB; Leffler DA; Sheth SG
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 50(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 26125461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of colonoscopic performance between medical and nurse endoscopists: a non-inferiority randomised controlled study in Asia.
Hui AJ; Lau JY; Lam PP; Chui AO; Fan AS; Lam TY; Tse YK; Tang RS; Ng SC; Wu JC; Ching JY; Wong MC; Chan FK; Sung J
Gut; 2015 Jul; 64(7):1058-62. PubMed ID: 25524261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.
Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Arrigoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; DiPlacido R; Ferrari A; Ferraris R; Ferrero F; Fracchia M; Gasperoni S; Malfitana G; Recchia S; Risio M; Rizzetto M; Saracco G; Spandre M; Turco D; Turco P; Zappa M;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 15741571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Dees J; Tytgat KM; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
Gut; 2012 Oct; 61(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 22187070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colonoscopy capacity in Tennessee: potential response to an increased demand for colorectal cancer screening.
Cattau EL
Tenn Med; 2010 Mar; 103(3):37-8, 40. PubMed ID: 20373642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
