These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21639610)

  • 1. Dynamics of the spelling process during a copy task: effects of regularity and frequency.
    Lambert E; Alamargot D; Larocque D; Caporossi G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Sep; 65(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 21639610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The locus of word frequency effects in skilled spelling-to-dictation.
    Chua SM; Liow SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1720-41. PubMed ID: 24303871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are word representations abstract or instance-based? Effects of spelling inconsistency in orthographic learning.
    Burt JS; Long J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Sep; 65(3):214-28. PubMed ID: 21875176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations.
    Delattre M; Bonin P; Barry C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1330-40. PubMed ID: 17087587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
    Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Locus of word frequency effects in spelling to dictation: Still at the orthographic level!
    Bonin P; Laroche B; Perret C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1814-1820. PubMed ID: 27088496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading and spelling acquisition in French: the role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors.
    Sprenger-Charolles L; Siegel LS; Bonnet P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Feb; 68(2):134-65. PubMed ID: 9503649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition?
    Kandel S; Perret C
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():325-36. PubMed ID: 25525970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading.
    Juhasz BJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 14622063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways?
    Bonin P; Méot A; Lagarrigue A; Roux S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1268-94. PubMed ID: 25338284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word length and word frequency affect eye movements in dyslexic children reading in a regular (German) orthography.
    Dürrwächter U; Sokolov AN; Reinhard J; Klosinski G; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    Ann Dyslexia; 2010 Jun; 60(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 20225005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning to read and spell in Persian: a cross-sectional study from Grades 1 to 4.
    Rahbari N; Sénéchal M
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 46(6):1514-27. PubMed ID: 20677856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading.
    Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Jacobs AM; Wimmer H
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):637-48. PubMed ID: 16115655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.