These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21639612)

  • 1. Spatial effects on tactile duration categorization.
    Grondin S; Kuroda T; Mitsudo T
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Sep; 65(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 21639612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of time intervals presented in sequences: spatial effects with multiple auditory sources.
    Grondin S; Plourde M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Oct; 26(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 17904236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exogenous visual attention prolongs perceived duration.
    Seifried T; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):68-85. PubMed ID: 21258910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Heed T; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 22(1):184-202. PubMed ID: 19199399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bare hands and attention: evidence for a tactile representation of the human body.
    Coslett HB; Lie E
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(14):1865-76. PubMed ID: 15381016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right parietal dominance in spatial egocentric discrimination.
    Loayza FR; Fernández-Seara MA; Aznárez-Sanado M; Pastor MA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(2):635-43. PubMed ID: 21147233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments.
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Apr; 379(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15814201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Somatosensory prior entry.
    Yates MJ; Nicholls ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):847-59. PubMed ID: 19429963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal order judgment in mice.
    Wada M; Moizumi S; Kitazawa S
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 157(1):167-75. PubMed ID: 15617783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The location and interpretation of the bisection point.
    Allan LG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Jan; 55(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 11900306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential evidence for the use of external coordinates in the preparation of tactile attention by the early blind.
    Eardley AF; van Velzen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 May; 33(10):1897-907. PubMed ID: 21545656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Auditory temporal discrimination: effects of stimulus duration, inter-stimulus interval, attention].
    Prosser S; Peronio M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1997 Apr; 17(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 9441565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of preferred hand and sex on the perception of tactile simultaneity.
    Geffen G; Rosa V; Luciano M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Apr; 22(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 10779836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals.
    Grondin S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1422-30. PubMed ID: 20601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial coding of touch at the fingers: Insights from double simultaneous stimulation within and between hands.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 20933059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1591-600. PubMed ID: 20675803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.