183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21639675)
1. Transposed letter priming with horizontal and vertical text in Japanese and English readers.
Witzel N; Qiao X; Forster K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):914-20. PubMed ID: 21639675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect.
Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1930-47. PubMed ID: 19358058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique.
Perea M; Acha J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19081083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does letter rotation decrease transposed letter priming effects?
Yang H; Lupker SJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2309-2318. PubMed ID: 30816764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Substituted-letter and transposed-letter effects in a masked priming paradigm with French developing readers and dyslexics.
Lété B; Fayol M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Jan; 114(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 23046691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
Acha J; Perea M
Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: masked priming effects.
Castles A; Davis C; Cavalot P; Forster K
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jul; 97(3):165-82. PubMed ID: 17408686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: JUGDE facilitates COURT.
Perea M; Palti D; Gomez P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 22274995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.
Grainger J; Granier JP; Farioli F; Van Assche E; van Heuven WJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):865-84. PubMed ID: 16846285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transposed-letter priming effects in reading aloud words and nonwords.
Mousikou P; Kinoshita S; Wu S; Norris D
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1437-42. PubMed ID: 25665798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script.
Perea M; Abu Mallouh R; Garcı A-Orza J; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):902-19. PubMed ID: 20924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there lexical competition in the recognition of L2 words for different-script bilinguals? An examination using masked priming with Japanese-English bilinguals.
Nakayama M; Lupker SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1168-1185. PubMed ID: 29683717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extending models of visual-word recognition to semicursive scripts: Evidence from masked priming in Uyghur.
Yakup M; Abliz W; Sereno J; Perea M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 26618626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
Frankish C; Barnes L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects.
Davis CJ; Bowers JS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):535-57. PubMed ID: 16822123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superset versus substitution-letter priming: an evaluation of open-bigram models.
Lupker SJ; Zhang YJ; Perry JR; Davis CJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 25485662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: evidence from incremental priming.
Ziegler JC; Ferrand L; Jacobs AM; Rey A; Grainger J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):671-92. PubMed ID: 10994225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The neural substrates of visual perceptual learning of words: implications for the visual word form area hypothesis.
Xue G; Poldrack RA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1643-55. PubMed ID: 18271738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
