These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21640011)
1. Peer confrontation: a model. Albardiaz R Educ Prim Care; 2011 May; 22(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 21640011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can peer group review by trainer group make a robust and effective contribution to the reapproval process across London Deanery? Spicer J; Torry R Educ Prim Care; 2011 Jul; 22(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 21781395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review. McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of peer review in general practice. Grol R; Mokkink H; Schellevis F J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jan; 38(306):10-3. PubMed ID: 3204541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review. Part 1: Attitudes to internal and external standards. Tracey JM N Z Med J; 1991 Jan; 104(904):8-10. PubMed ID: 2008263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review: a practical guide. Allbritten D; Boland M; Hubert P; Kiernan B Pediatr Nurs; 1982; 8(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 6916179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Update: PSRO transmittal. Peer review by health care practitioners other than physicians. Rogers J Med Rec News; 1977 Apr; 48(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 10305612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review for the nurse-directed health service. Woolard D; Peterson AM J Am Coll Health; 1989 Sep; 38(2):91-3. PubMed ID: 2778230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review for nonphysicians. Ostrow PC; Jones E Hospitals; 1979 Dec; 53(23):66-9. PubMed ID: 291568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse--a focus on critical incidents. Kenny KJ; Baker L; Lanzon M; Stevens LR; Yancy M J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Jul; 20(7):376-81. PubMed ID: 18638177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Peer review in a hospital: the selective use of packed cells for transfusions as a topic of prospective quality control]. Casparie AF; Reerink E Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Apr; 121(16):666-70. PubMed ID: 854110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of an interpractice visit peer review program for rural Australian general practice registrars. Fraser J Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Mar; 35(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16525528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review: self help for occupational health nurses. McLain EH AAOHN J; 1990 Mar; 38(3):110-3. PubMed ID: 2317237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: a model for professional accountability. Mullins AC; Colavecchio RE; Tescher BE J Nurs Adm; 1979 Dec; 9(12):25-30. PubMed ID: 259635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Funding should recognize the value of peer review. Dominiczak MH Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6919):111. PubMed ID: 12520276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The peer review process. Mann BA West J Med; 1989 Nov; 151(5):561. PubMed ID: 2603425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Infection control in practice. Infection control--peer review. Coates EA; Gaffney A Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1996 Apr; 13():115-8. PubMed ID: 9178981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]