225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21640893)
1. Replacing a failed mini-implant with a miniplate to prevent interruption during orthodontic treatment.
Lee JH; Choo H; Kim SH; Chung KR; Giannuzzi LA; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):849-57. PubMed ID: 21640893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure?
Kim SH; Kang SM; Choi YS; Kook YA; Chung KR; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical application of accelerated osteogenic orthodontics and partially osseointegrated mini-implants for minor tooth movement.
Kim SH; Kook YA; Jeong DM; Lee W; Chung KR; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 19732678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Orthodontic miniplate with tube as an efficient tool for borderline cases.
Chung KR; Kim SH; Kang YG; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 21457867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog.
Ohmae M; Saito S; Morohashi T; Seki K; Qu H; Kanomi R; Yamasaki KI; Okano T; Yamada S; Shibasaki Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 11343020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics.
Leung MT; Rabie AB; Wong RW
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 18458028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical applications of mini-implants as orthodontic anchorage and the peri-implant tissue reaction upon loading.
Cho HJ
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct; 34(10):813-20. PubMed ID: 17087396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient usage of implant anchorage to treat overerupted maxillary first molar and mesially inclined mandibular molars.
Ohura R; Kuroda S; Takahashi T; Tomita Y; Tanaka E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21195284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reasons for mini-implants failure: choosing installation site should be valued!
Consolaro A; Romano FL
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):18-24. PubMed ID: 24945511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molar intrusion with implants using a bite plane appliance: a case report.
Kato S; Kato M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19076182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting the stability of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
Yao CC; Chang HH; Chang JZ; Lai HH; Lu SC; Chen YJ
J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Nov; 114(11):1122-8. PubMed ID: 25260551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
Romano FL; Consolaro A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
