These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Surgical complications specific to monopolar electrosurgical energy: engineering changes that have made electrosurgery safer. Odell RC J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 23659749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternate-site burns from improperly seated electrosurgical pencil active electrodes. Health Devices; 2000 Jan; 29(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10631561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Unipolar electrosurgery in operative laparoscopy. Capacitance as a potential source of injury. Grosskinsky CM; Hulka JF J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):549-52. PubMed ID: 7473449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Using the electric scalpel in laparoscopy. Principles and prevention of complications]. Mutter D Ann Chir; 1998; 52(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9752409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternate-site burns from improperly seated or damaged electrosurgical pencil active electrodes. Health Devices; 2012 Oct; 41(10):334. PubMed ID: 23444680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Advincula AP Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Kakeji Y; Konishi K; Ieiri S; Yasunaga T; Nakamoto M; Tanoue K; Baba H; Maehara Y; Hashizume M Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17520647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Voyles CR; Tucker RD Am J Surg; 1992 Jul; 164(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 1385675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety technologies for laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery; devices for managing burn risks. ECRI Health Devices; 2005 Aug; 34(8):259-72. PubMed ID: 16255230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety in laparoscopic electrosurgery. OR Manager; 1999 May; 15(5):30. PubMed ID: 10387883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining insulation-check protocols for laparoscopic instruments. Hiatt C Mater Manag Health Care; 2007 Oct; 16(10):44. PubMed ID: 18030937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Monopolar electrosurgery through single-port laparoscopy: a potential hidden hazard for bowel burns. Abu-Rafea B; Vilos GA; Al-Obeed O; AlSheikh A; Vilos AG; Al-Mandeel H J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 21925969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The advantages of laparoscopic assisted bipolar high-frequency surgery. Mueller W Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1993 Apr; 1(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 8055307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrosurgery thermal injury. Myth or misconception? Saye WB; Miller W; Hertzmann P Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1991 Dec; 1(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 1669408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]