These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21641145)
1. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting. Chandra S; Hess EP; Agarwal D; Nestler DM; Montori VM; Song LM; Wells GA; Stiell IG Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 30(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 21641145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended? Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit. Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems. Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department. Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-endoscopic Rockall and Blatchford scores to identify which emergency department patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleed do not need endoscopic hemostasis. Meltzer AC; Burnett S; Pinchbeck C; Brown AL; Choudhri T; Yadav K; Fleischer DE; Pines JM J Emerg Med; 2013 Jun; 44(6):1083-7. PubMed ID: 23360648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ahn S; Lim KS; Lee YS; Lee JL J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1288-94. PubMed ID: 23432611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Is there a place for the Glasgow-Blatchford score in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding?]. Jerraya H; Bousslema A; Frikha F; Dziri C Tunis Med; 2011 Dec; 89(12):916-9. PubMed ID: 22198893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Can Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score Predict the Occurrence of Hypotension in Initially Normotensive Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?]. Kim JS; Ko BS; Son CH; Ahn S; Seo DW; Lee YS; Lee JH; Oh BJ; Lim KS; Kim WY Korean J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 67(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26809627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China. Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems. Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage? Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland. Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Hess EP; Perry JJ; Calder LA; Thiruganasambandamoorthy V; Body R; Jaffe A; Wells GA; Stiell IG Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Apr; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 20370775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]