192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21641629)
1. Field performance evaluation of a newly developed PM₂.₅ sampler at IIT Kanpur.
Gupta T; Jaiprakash ; Dubey S
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Aug; 409(18):3500-7. PubMed ID: 21641629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of personal exposure to inhalable indoor and outdoor particulate matter for student residents of an academic campus (IIT-Kanpur).
Devi JJ; Gupta T; Tripathi SN; Ujinwal KK
Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 21(14):1208-22. PubMed ID: 19807217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of a high-volume cascade impactor in six European urban environments: mass measurement and chemical characterization of size-segregated particulate samples.
Pennanen AS; Sillanpää M; Hillamo R; Quass U; John AC; Branis M; Hůnová I; Meliefste K; Janssen NA; Koskentalo T; Castaño-Vinyals G; Bouso L; Chalbot MC; Kavouras IG; Salonen RO
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Mar; 374(2-3):297-310. PubMed ID: 17287015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS).
Geyh AS; Hering S; Kreisberg N; John W
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Nov; (122):1-22; discussion 23-9. PubMed ID: 15675716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Particle size distribution of ambient aerosols in an industrial area.
Rao BP; Srivastava A; Yasmin F; Ray S; Gupta N; Chauhan C; Rao CV; Wate SR
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 May; 88(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 22307732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the SidePak personal monitor with the Aerosol Particle Sizer (APS).
Sánchez Jiménez A; van Tongeren M; Galea KS; Steinsvåg K; MacCalman L; Cherrie JW
J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1841-6. PubMed ID: 21528134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new semivolatile aerosol dichotomous sampler.
Kim SW; Raynor PC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19279161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols using a particle trap impactor/denuder sampler.
Mader BT; Flagan RC; Seinfeld JH
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Dec; 35(24):4857-67. PubMed ID: 11775162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental methods to determine inhalability and personal sampler performance for aerosols in ultra-low windspeed environments.
Schmees DK; Wu YH; Vincent JH
J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1426-36. PubMed ID: 19037484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness, suitability, and performance testing of the SKC Deployable Particulate Sampler (DPS) as compared to the currently deployed Airmetrics MiniVol portable air sampler.
Patterson SL; Rusiecki JA; Barnes SL; Heller JM; Sutphin JB; Kluchinsky TA
J Environ Health; 2010 Oct; 73(3):16-22. PubMed ID: 20960983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A personal particle speciation sampler.
Hering S; Kreisberg N; John W
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2003 Feb; (114):1-27; discussion 29-34. PubMed ID: 12670062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aerosol sampling by annular aspiration slots.
Görner P; Witschger O; Roger F; Wrobel R; Fabriès JF
J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1437-47. PubMed ID: 19037485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Passive aerosol sampler for particle concentrations and size distributions.
Whitehead T; Leith D
J Environ Monit; 2008 Mar; 10(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 18392275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting optimal monitoring site locations for peak ambient particulate material concentrations using the MM5-CAMx4 numerical modelling system.
Sturman A; Titov M; Zawar-Reza P
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 21138778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Size-separated sampling and analysis of isocyanates in workplace aerosols. Part I. Denuder--cascade impactor sampler.
Dahlin J; Spanne M; Karlsson D; Dalene M; Skarping G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jul; 52(5):361-74. PubMed ID: 18458354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Source identification of different size fraction of PM10 using factor analysis at residential cum commercial area of Nagpur city.
Pipalatkar PP; Gajghate DG; Khaparde VV
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 88(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22033656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
