97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21642022)
41. The effect of PEGT/PBT scaffold architecture on oxygen gradients in tissue engineered cartilaginous constructs.
Malda J; Woodfield TB; van der Vloodt F; Kooy FK; Martens DE; Tramper J; van Blitterswijk CA; Riesle J
Biomaterials; 2004 Nov; 25(26):5773-80. PubMed ID: 15147823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preparation and evaluation of microporous organogel scaffolds for cell viability and proliferation.
Lukyanova L; Franceschi-Messant S; Vicendo P; Perez E; Rico-Lattes I; Weinkamer R
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2010 Aug; 79(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20427161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors.
Fedorovich NE; Kuipers E; Gawlitta D; Dhert WJ; Alblas J
Tissue Eng Part A; 2011 Oct; 17(19-20):2473-86. PubMed ID: 21599540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Processing of polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone-based copolymers into 3D scaffolds, and their cellular responses.
Hoque ME; San WY; Wei F; Li S; Huang MH; Vert M; Hutmacher DW
Tissue Eng Part A; 2009 Oct; 15(10):3013-24. PubMed ID: 19331580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Design and validation of a dynamic flow perfusion bioreactor for use with compliant tissue engineering scaffolds.
Jaasma MJ; Plunkett NA; O'Brien FJ
J Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 133(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 18221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cell seeding of tissue engineering scaffolds studied by Monte Carlo simulations.
Robu A; Neagu A; Stoicu-Tivadar L
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():882-6. PubMed ID: 21893873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Engineering of implantable liver tissues.
Sakai Y; Nishikawa M; Evenou F; Hamon M; Huang H; Montagne KP; Kojima N; Fujii T; Niino T
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 826():189-216. PubMed ID: 22167650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biodegradation and in vivo biocompatibility of a degradable, polar/hydrophobic/ionic polyurethane for tissue engineering applications.
McBane JE; Sharifpoor S; Cai K; Labow RS; Santerre JP
Biomaterials; 2011 Sep; 32(26):6034-44. PubMed ID: 21641638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Porous hollow membrane sheet for tissue engineering applications.
Hadjizadeh A; Mohebbi-Kalhori D
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jun; 93(3):1140-50. PubMed ID: 19768796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Computational evaluation of oxygen and shear stress distributions in 3D perfusion culture systems: macro-scale and micro-structured models.
Cioffi M; Küffer J; Ströbel S; Dubini G; Martin I; Wendt D
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2918-25. PubMed ID: 18789444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of scaffold architecture and pore size on smooth muscle cell growth.
Lee M; Wu BM; Dunn JC
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 18257081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Ti6Ta4Sn alloy and subsequent scaffolding for bone tissue engineering.
Li Y; Xiong J; Wong CS; Hodgson PD; Wen C
Tissue Eng Part A; 2009 Oct; 15(10):3151-9. PubMed ID: 19351266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mag-seeding of rat bone marrow stromal cells into porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Shimizu K; Ito A; Honda H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2007 Sep; 104(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 17964479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells.
Oliveira JM; Rodrigues MT; Silva SS; Malafaya PB; Gomes ME; Viegas CA; Dias IR; Azevedo JT; Mano JF; Reis RL
Biomaterials; 2006 Dec; 27(36):6123-37. PubMed ID: 16945410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Fabrication of scaffold with controlled porous structure and flow perfusion culture in vitro].
Li X; Li DC; Wang L; Lu BH; Wang Z
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 21(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 16176096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Fabrication of gelatin-hyaluronic acid hybrid scaffolds with tunable porous structures for soft tissue engineering.
Zhang F; He C; Cao L; Feng W; Wang H; Mo X; Wang J
Int J Biol Macromol; 2011 Apr; 48(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 21255605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fabrication of individual scaffolds based on a patient-specific alveolar bone defect model.
Li J; Zhang L; Lv S; Li S; Wang N; Zhang Z
J Biotechnol; 2011 Jan; 151(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 21056602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Co-electrospun dual scaffolding system with potential for muscle-tendon junction tissue engineering.
Ladd MR; Lee SJ; Stitzel JD; Atala A; Yoo JJ
Biomaterials; 2011 Feb; 32(6):1549-59. PubMed ID: 21093046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Functionalization of chitosan/poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) sintered microsphere scaffolds via surface heparinization for bone tissue engineering.
Jiang T; Khan Y; Nair LS; Abdel-Fattah WI; Laurencin CT
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jun; 93(3):1193-208. PubMed ID: 19777575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In silico prediction of the cell proliferation in porous scaffold using model of effective pore.
Makhaniok A; Haranava Y; Goranov V; Panseri S; Semerikhina S; Russo A; Marcacci M; Dediu V
Biosystems; 2013 Dec; 114(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 24141144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
