104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21642127)
21. Phylogenetic relationships in Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae sensu stricto based on matK gene, chlL gene, trnL-trnF IGS region, and trnL intron sequences.
Kusumi J; Tsumura Y; Yoshimaru H; Tachida H
Am J Bot; 2000 Oct; 87(10):1480-8. PubMed ID: 11034923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Molecular phylogeny of Coelogyne (Epidendroideae; Orchidaceae) based on plastid RFLPS, matK, and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences: evidence for polyphyly.
Gravendeel B; Chase MW; de Vogel EF; Roos MC; Mes TH; Bachmann K
Am J Bot; 2001 Oct; 88(10):1915-27. PubMed ID: 21669624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phylogenetic relationships in Disa based on non-coding trnL-trnF chloroplast sequences: evidence of numerous repeat regions.
Bellstedt DU; Linder HP; Harley EH
Am J Bot; 2001 Nov; 88(11):2088-100. PubMed ID: 21669640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Phylogenetics, ancestral state reconstruction, and a new infrafamilial classification of the pantropical Ochnaceae (Medusagynaceae, Ochnaceae s.str., Quiinaceae) based on five DNA regions.
Schneider JV; Bissiengou P; Amaral Mdo C; Tahir A; Fay MF; Thines M; Sosef MS; Zizka G; Chatrou LW
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():199-214. PubMed ID: 24862223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monophyly of the Convolvulaceae and circumscription of their major lineages based on DNA sequences of multiple chloroplast loci.
Stefanovic S; Krueger L; Olmstead RG
Am J Bot; 2002 Sep; 89(9):1510-22. PubMed ID: 21665753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Molecular phylogenetics of Meliaceae (Sapindales) based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences.
Muellner AN; Samuel R; Johnson SA; Cheek M; Pennington TD; Chase MW
Am J Bot; 2003 Mar; 90(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 21659140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phylogenetics of tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae; Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) based on nrITS and plastid matK DNA sequence data.
Kathriarachchi H; Samuel R; Hoffmann P; Mlinarec J; Wurdack KJ; Ralimanana H; Stuessy TF; Chase MW
Am J Bot; 2006 Apr; 93(4):637-55. PubMed ID: 21646224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence.
Whitten WM; Williams NH; Chase MW
Am J Bot; 2000 Dec; 87(12):1842-56. PubMed ID: 11118422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A phylogenetic evaluation of a biosystematic framework: Brodiaea and related petaloid monocots (Themidaceae).
Pires JC; Sytsma KJ
Am J Bot; 2002 Aug; 89(8):1342-59. PubMed ID: 21665737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Exploring phylogeny of the microsoroid ferns (Polypodiaceae) based on six plastid DNA markers.
Chen CC; Hyvönen J; Schneider H
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2020 Feb; 143():106665. PubMed ID: 31704235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/ matK and trnL-trnF sequences.
Nyffeler R
Am J Bot; 2002 Feb; 89(2):312-26. PubMed ID: 21669740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Phylogenetic relationships within Colchicaceae.
Vinnersten A; Reeves G
Am J Bot; 2003 Oct; 90(10):1455-62. PubMed ID: 21659097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Phylogenetic relationships among Strobilanthes s.l. (Acanthaceae): evidence from ITS nrDNA, trnL-F cpDNA, and morphology.
Moylan EC; Bennett JR; Carine MA; Olmstead RG; Scotland RW
Am J Bot; 2004 May; 91(5):724-35. PubMed ID: 21653427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phylogeny of Malpighiaceae: evidence from chloroplast ndhF and trnl-F nucleotide sequences.
Davis CC; Anderson WR; Donoghue MJ
Am J Bot; 2001 Oct; 88(10):1830-46. PubMed ID: 21669617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the monophyly of Fritillaria and Lilium (Liliaceae; Liliales) and the infrageneric classification of Fritillaria.
Rønsted N; Law S; Thornton H; Fay MF; Chase MW
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Jun; 35(3):509-27. PubMed ID: 15878122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An overview of the phylogenetic relationships within Epidendroideae inferred from multiple DNA regions and recircumscription of Epidendreae and Arethuseae (Orchidaceae).
van den Berg C; Goldman DH; Freudenstein JV; Pridgeon AM; Cameron KM; Chase MW
Am J Bot; 2005 Apr; 92(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 21652439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): evidence from molecular data.
Kress WJ; Prince LM; Williams KJ
Am J Bot; 2002 Oct; 89(10):1682-96. PubMed ID: 21665595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Molecular phylogenetics of Limonium and related genera (Plumbaginaceae): biogeographical and systematic implications.
Lledó MD; Crespo MB; Fay MF; Chase MW
Am J Bot; 2005 Jul; 92(7):1189-98. PubMed ID: 21646141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Molecular phylogenetics reveals Leontodon (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) to be diphyletic.
Samuel R; Gutermann W; Stuessy TF; Ruas CF; Lack HW; Tremetsberger K; Talavera S; Hermanowski B; Ehrendorfer F
Am J Bot; 2006 Aug; 93(8):1193-205. PubMed ID: 21642184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Caricaceae based on rDNA internal transcribed spacers and chloroplast sequence data.
Kyndt T; Van Droogenbroeck B; Romeijn-Peeters E; Romero-Motochi JP; Scheldeman X; Goetghebeur P; Van Damme P; Gheysen G
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Nov; 37(2):442-59. PubMed ID: 16095925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
