BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21642369)

  • 1. Management of alert messages in the remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers: an Italian single-region study.
    Folino AF; Chiusso F; Zanotto G; Vaccari D; Gasparini G; Megna A; Marras E; Mantovan R; Vaglio A; Boscolo G; Biancalana G; Leoni L; Iliceto S; Buja G
    Europace; 2011 Sep; 13(9):1281-91. PubMed ID: 21642369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: patients' inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey.
    Gramegna L; Tomasi C; Gasparini G; Scaboro G; Zanon F; Boaretto G; Tomei R; Tomasi L
    Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22080472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remote monitoring reduces healthcare use and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: the evolution of management strategies of heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators (EVOLVO) study.
    Landolina M; Perego GB; Lunati M; Curnis A; Guenzati G; Vicentini A; Parati G; Borghi G; Zanaboni P; Valsecchi S; Marzegalli M
    Circulation; 2012 Jun; 125(24):2985-92. PubMed ID: 22626743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure.
    Spencker S; Coban N; Koch L; Schirdewan A; Müller D
    Europace; 2009 Apr; 11(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 19103654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database.
    Lazarus A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S2-S12. PubMed ID: 17302706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population.
    Sacher F; Probst V; Bessouet M; Wright M; Maluski A; Abbey S; Bordachar P; Deplagne A; Ploux S; Lande G; Jaïs P; Hocini M; Haïssaguerre M; Le Marec H; Clémenty J
    Europace; 2009 Apr; 11(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 19218576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient alert in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: toy or tool?
    Becker R; Ruf-Richter J; Senges-Becker JC; Bauer A; Weretka S; Voss F; Katus HA; Schoels W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 15234415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical and practical aspects of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients in Poland - preliminary results.
    Przybylski A; Zakrzewska-Koperska J; Maciag A; Derejko P; Orczykowski M; Szumowski L; Walczak F
    Kardiol Pol; 2009 May; 67(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 19521935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Heidbüchel H; Lioen P; Foulon S; Huybrechts W; Ector J; Willems R; Ector H
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18245771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization.
    Ricci RP; Morichelli L; Santini M
    Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 18199570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic impedance monitoring and patient alert feature in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: being alert for the unexpected!
    Duru F; Luechinger R; Scharf C; Brunckhorst C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 15828892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manpower and outpatient clinic workload for remote monitoring of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: data from the HomeGuide Registry.
    Ricci RP; Morichelli L; D'Onofrio A; Calò L; Vaccari D; Zanotto G; Curnis A; Buja G; Rovai N; Gargaro A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1216-23. PubMed ID: 24964380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alert tones are frequently inaudible among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Simons EC; Feigenblum DY; Nemirovsky D; Simons GR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Oct; 32(10):1272-5. PubMed ID: 19691679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote monitoring of implantable-cardioverter defibrillators: results from the Reliability of IEGM Online Interpretation (RIONI) study.
    Perings C; Bauer WR; Bondke HJ; Mewis C; James M; Böcker D; Broadhurst P; Korte T; Toft E; Hintringer F; Clémenty J; Schwab JO
    Europace; 2011 Feb; 13(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21252195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Actions elicited during scheduled and unscheduled in-hospital follow-up of cardiac devices: results of the ATHENS multicentre registry.
    Mascioli G; Curnis A; Landolina M; Klersy C; Gelmini GP; Ruffa F;
    Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1766-73. PubMed ID: 21764815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rise in ICD shock impedance: lead fracture or death?
    Stroobandt RX; Van Heuverswyn FE; Kucher A; Barold SS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Sep; 35(9):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22734696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices in the Asia-Pacific.
    Lau CP; Zhang S
    Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i65-i68. PubMed ID: 23737235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implantation trends and patient profiles for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the United States: 1993-2006.
    Kurtz SM; Ochoa JA; Lau E; Shkolnikov Y; Pavri BB; Frisch D; Greenspon AJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Jun; 33(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20059714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
    Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of continuous intracardiac ST-segment monitoring on mid-term outcomes of ICD-implanted patients with coronary artery disease. Early results of a prospective comparison with conventional ICD outcomes.
    Forleo GB; Tesauro M; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Sergi D; Di Molfetta A; Santini L; Romeo F
    Heart; 2012 Mar; 98(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 22115985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.