These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21645188)

  • 1. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice?
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
    Street J; Duszynski K; Krawczyk S; Braunack-Mayer A
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 May; 109():1-9. PubMed ID: 24657639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Citizens' Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum.
    Street JM; Callaghan P; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 26686790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relations.
    Molster C; Potts A; McNamara B; Youngs L; Maxwell S; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2013 Sep; 17(9):713-8. PubMed ID: 23862565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks.
    MacLean S; Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 20977185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
    Degeling C; Rychetnik L; Street J; Thomas R; Carter SM
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 179():166-171. PubMed ID: 28285232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracy.
    Rychetnik L; Carter SM; Abelson J; Thornton H; Barratt A; Entwistle VA; Mackenzie G; Salkeld G; Glasziou P
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23378639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia.
    Walmsley H
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):452-68. PubMed ID: 20977183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters.
    Fredriksson M; Tritter JQ
    Sociol Health Illn; 2017 Jan; 39(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 27862007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.
    De Vries R; Stanczyk A; Wall IF; Uhlmann R; Damschroder LJ; Kim SY
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1896-1903. PubMed ID: 20378225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.
    Abelson J; Forest PG; Eyles J; Smith P; Martin E; Gauvin FP
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Jul; 57(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 12765705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.
    Bentley C; Peacock S; Abelson J; Burgess MM; Demers-Payette O; Longstaff H; Tripp L; Lavis JN; Wilson MG
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 30732616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Hawkins AK; Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Nov; 75(9):1604-11. PubMed ID: 22867865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Dutch Citizen Forum on Public Reimbursement of Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Opinion Change.
    Jansen M; Baltussen R; Bijlmakers L; Tummers M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 32610763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving drug policy: The potential of broader democratic participation.
    Ritter A; Lancaster K; Diprose R
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 May; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 29428297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.