These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21645188)

  • 21. Pandemic influenza communication: views from a deliberative forum.
    Rogers WA; Street JM; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE;
    Health Expect; 2009 Sep; 12(3):331-42. PubMed ID: 19754694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Testing a deliberative democracy method with citizens of African ancestry to weigh pros and cons of targeted screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk.
    Guan Y; Pathak S; Ballard D; Veluswamy JK; McCullough LE; McBride CM; Gornick MC
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():984926. PubMed ID: 36424974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial.
    Draucker C; Carrión A; Ott MA; Knopf A
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e51202. PubMed ID: 38090788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Representation or reason: consulting the public on the ethics of health policy.
    Mullen C
    Health Care Anal; 2008 Dec; 16(4):397-409. PubMed ID: 17922193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.
    Newson AJ; de Lacey S; Dowling DK; Murray S; Sue CM; Thorburn DR; Gillam L; Degeling C
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 30865256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Deliberative Democracy and stem cell research in New York State: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Sulmasy DP
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Mar; 19(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 19306697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.
    Costa S; Bentley C; Regier DA; McTaggart-Cowan H; Mitton C; Burgess MM; Peacock SJ
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):977. PubMed ID: 31331312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.
    Abelson J; Eyles J; McLeod CB; Collins P; McMullan C; Forest PG
    Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 14499168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increasing the Legitimacy of Tough Choices in Healthcare Reimbursement: Approach and Results of a Citizen Forum in The Netherlands.
    Bijlmakers L; Jansen M; Boer B; van Dijk W; Groenewoud S; Zwaap J; Helderman JK; van Exel J; Baltussen R
    Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 31952671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?
    Krinks R; Kendall E; Whitty JA; Scuffham PA
    Health Expect; 2016 Oct; 19(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 26414486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.
    Burgess M; O'Doherty K; Secko D
    Per Med; 2008 May; 5(3):285-296. PubMed ID: 29783499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups.
    Hodgetts K; Hiller JE; Street JM; Carter D; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Watt AM; Moss JR; Elshaug AG;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 May; 14():204. PubMed ID: 24885716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks.
    Longstaff H; Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 20533799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.
    Scurr T; Ganann R; Sibbald SL; Valaitis R; Kothari A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(11):2638-2650. PubMed ID: 35247938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods.
    Fishkin JS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S19-S24. PubMed ID: 34905249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How deliberative designs empower citizens' voices: A case study on Ghana's deliberative poll on agriculture and the environment.
    Chen K
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Feb; 30(2):179-195. PubMed ID: 33103601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".
    Jiménez-Pernett J
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7701. PubMed ID: 37579393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.
    Walmsley HL
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21683492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Public Deliberation Process on Patient Perspectives on Health Information Sharing: Evaluative Descriptive Study.
    Raj M; Ryan K; Nong P; Calhoun K; Trinidad MG; De Vries R; Creary M; Spector-Bagdady K; Kardia SLR; Platt J
    JMIR Cancer; 2022 Sep; 8(3):e37793. PubMed ID: 36112409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the public acceptability of proposed policy interventions to reduce the misuse of antibiotics in Australia: A report on two community juries.
    Degeling C; Johnson J; Iredell J; Nguyen KA; Norris JM; Turnidge JD; Dawson A; Carter SM; Gilbert GL
    Health Expect; 2018 Feb; 21(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 28665050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.