These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21645188)

  • 61. Reluctant rationers: public input to health care priorities.
    Lomas J
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1997 Apr; 2(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 10180361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Allocating health care: cost-utility analysis, informed democratic decision making, or the veil of ignorance?
    Goold SD
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1996; 21(1):69-98. PubMed ID: 8708343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Implementing a public deliberative forum.
    O'Doherty K; Gauvin FP; Grogan C; Friedman W
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 22733326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of two methods of deliberative participation of older people in food-policy development.
    Timotijevic L; Raats MM
    Health Policy; 2007 Aug; 82(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17067716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Citizen participation and the health policies of Unasur.
    Campos RF
    Cien Saude Colet; 2017 Jul; 22(7):2161-2167. PubMed ID: 28723998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities.
    Murphy NJ
    Health Expect; 2005 Jun; 8(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 15860057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Making "ethical safe space" in the translation of contested knowledge: the role of community debate in defining end-of-life decision ethics.
    Kaufert J; Schwartz K; Wiebe R; Derksen J; Lutfiyya ZM; Richert D
    Palliat Support Care; 2013 Apr; 11(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 23259991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.
    Boivin A; Lehoux P; Burgers J; Grol R
    Milbank Q; 2014 Jun; 92(2):319-50. PubMed ID: 24890250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Engaging civil society through deliberative dialogue to create the first Mental Health Strategy for Canada: Changing Directions, Changing Lives.
    Mulvale G; Chodos H; Bartram M; MacKinnon MP; Abud M
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 123():262-8. PubMed ID: 25147056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Moving knowledge about family violence into public health policy and practice: a mixed method study of a deliberative dialogue.
    Boyko JA; Kothari A; Wathen CN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Apr; 14():31. PubMed ID: 27098267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cloning and deliberation: Korean consensus conference.
    Kim MS
    Dev World Bioeth; 2002 Dec; 2(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 12870502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Policy, management and participation in health: a reflection based on Habermas' theory of communicative action].
    Müller Neto JS; Artmann E
    Cien Saude Colet; 2012 Dec; 17(12):3407-16. PubMed ID: 23175416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.
    Henderson J; House E; Coveney J; Meyer S; Ankeny R; Ward P; Calnan M
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Jun; 13():596. PubMed ID: 23782688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, reproductive freedom, and deliberative democracy.
    Farrelly C
    J Med Philos; 2009 Apr; 34(2):135-54. PubMed ID: 19251775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. An ethical framework for evaluation of public health plans: a systematic process for legitimate and fair decision-making.
    Akrami F; Zali A; Abbasi M; Majdzadeh R; Karimi A; Fadavi M; Mehrabi Bahar A
    Public Health; 2018 Nov; 164():30-38. PubMed ID: 30170266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.
    Wortley S; Tong A; Howard K
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27050156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Ethical considerations relating to healthcare resource allocation decisions.
    Olver I; Dodds S; Kenner J; Kerridge I; McGovern K; Milligan E; Mortimer R;
    Intern Med J; 2019 Nov; 49(11):1364-1367. PubMed ID: 31713342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Integrating Public Health and Deliberative Public Bioethics: Lessons from the Human Genome Project Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program.
    Meagher KM; Lee LM
    Public Health Rep; 2016; 131(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26843669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Norms in tension: democracy and efficiency in Bangladeshi health and population sector reform.
    Shiffman J; Wu Y
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Nov; 57(9):1547-57. PubMed ID: 12948566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Involving the public in decision-making about large-scale changes to health services: A scoping review.
    Djellouli N; Jones L; Barratt H; Ramsay AIG; Towndrow S; Oliver S
    Health Policy; 2019 Jul; 123(7):635-645. PubMed ID: 31147108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.