These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21645375)

  • 21. Autosomal suppression and fitness costs of an old driving X chromosome in Drosophila testacea.
    Keais GL; Lu S; Perlman SJ
    J Evol Biol; 2020 May; 33(5):619-628. PubMed ID: 31990433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An investigation of the sex-specific genetic architecture of fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Singh A; Hasan A; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2023 Sep; 77(9):2015-2028. PubMed ID: 37329263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association between sex ratio distortion and sexually antagonistic fitness consequences of female choice.
    Connallon T; Jakubowski E
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2179-83. PubMed ID: 19453376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Autosomal and X-Linked Additive Genetic Variation for Lifespan and Aging: Comparisons Within and Between the Sexes in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Griffin RM; Schielzeth H; Friberg U
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Dec; 6(12):3903-3911. PubMed ID: 27678519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selection for increased female sexual receptivity in raised stocks of Drosophila melanogaster.
    McRobert SP; Schnee FB; Tompkins L
    Behav Genet; 1995 Jul; 25(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 7575359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species.
    Harris M; Kim BY; Garud N
    Genetics; 2024 Apr; 226(4):. PubMed ID: 38366786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex, mutation and fitness: asymmetric costs and routes to recovery through compensatory evolution.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale A
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1115-22. PubMed ID: 16033585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fitness effects of EMS-induced mutations on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Hemizygous fitness effects.
    Mitchell JA; Simmons MJ
    Genetics; 1977 Dec; 87(4):775-83. PubMed ID: 604165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differential sexual survival of Drosophila melanogaster on copper sulfate.
    Balinski MA; Woodruff RC
    Genetica; 2017 Apr; 145(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 28154959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chavarrías D; López-Fanjul C; García-Dorado A
    Genetics; 2001 Jun; 158(2):681-93. PubMed ID: 11404332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simpler mode of inheritance of transcriptional variation in male Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wayne ML; Telonis-Scott M; Bono LM; Harshman L; Kopp A; Nuzhdin SV; McIntyre LM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Nov; 104(47):18577-82. PubMed ID: 18003923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of deleterious mutations, sexually antagonistic selection, and mode of recombination suppression on transitions between male and female heterogamety.
    Saunders PA; Neuenschwander S; Perrin N
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Sep; 123(3):419-428. PubMed ID: 31028370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex-specific trans-regulatory variation on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.
    Stocks M; Dean R; Rogell B; Friberg U
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005015. PubMed ID: 25679222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The microevolutionary response to male-limited X-chromosome evolution in Drosophila melanogaster reflects macroevolutionary patterns.
    Abbott JK; Chippindale AK; Morrow EH
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jun; 33(6):738-750. PubMed ID: 32176391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does operational sex ratio influence relative strength of purging selection in males versus females?
    Plesnar-Bielak A; Sychta K; Gaczorek TS; Palka JK; Prus MA; Prokop ZM
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 31549754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.
    Ohnishi O
    Genetics; 1977 Nov; 87(3):529-45. PubMed ID: 200526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accumulation of deleterious mutations: additional Drosophila melanogaster estimates and a simulation of the effects of selection.
    Caballero A; Cusi E; García C; García-Dorado A
    Evolution; 2002 Jun; 56(6):1150-9. PubMed ID: 12144016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the rate and linearity of viability declines in Drosophila mutation-accumulation experiments: genomic mutation rates and synergistic epistasis revisited.
    Fry JD
    Genetics; 2004 Feb; 166(2):797-806. PubMed ID: 15020469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.