These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21645879)

  • 1. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EMDR and mindfulness. Eye movements and attentional breathing tax working memory and reduce vividness and emotionality of aversive ideation.
    van den Hout MA; Engelhard IM; Beetsma D; Slofstra C; Hornsveld H; Houtveen J; Leer A
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 42(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 21570931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task.
    Kwon G; Lim S; Kim MY; Kwon H; Lee YH; Kim K; Lee EJ; Suh M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():381. PubMed ID: 26175681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is verbal-spatial binding in working memory impaired by a concurrent memory load?
    Elsley JV; Parmentier FB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1696-705. PubMed ID: 19391042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errorless learning and working memory: the impact of errors, distractors, and memory span load on immediate recall in healthy adults.
    Nordvik JE; Schanke AK; Landro NI
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Jun; 33(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 21298584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired semantic knowledge underlies the reduced verbal short-term storage capacity in Alzheimer's disease.
    Peters F; Majerus S; De Baerdemaeker J; Salmon E; Collette F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3067-73. PubMed ID: 19607851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive task fulfilment may decrease gaze control performances.
    Meyer C; Gauchard GC; Deviterne D; Perrin PP
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Dec; 92(5):861-6. PubMed ID: 17655886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frontoparietal EEG alpha-phase synchrony reflects differential attentional demands during word recall and oculomotor dual-tasks.
    Kwon G; Kim MY; Lim S; Kwon H; Lee YH; Kim K; Lee EJ; Suh M
    Neuroreport; 2015 Dec; 26(18):1161-7. PubMed ID: 26559729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in working memory capacity in recency effects: from the recall process.
    Sasaki T
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Apr; 104(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 19610484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the effect of verbal working memory load on visuo-spatial exogenous orienting.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 413(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17174028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
    Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span?
    Healey MK; Hasher L; Danilova E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 21767041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specific interference between a cognitive task and sensory organization for stance balance control in healthy young adults: visuospatial effects.
    Chong RK; Mills B; Dailey L; Lane E; Smith S; Lee KH
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2709-18. PubMed ID: 20478320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Picture span test: measuring visual working memory capacity involved in remembering and comprehension.
    Tanabe A; Osaka N
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 19363171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age differences in stroop interference in working memory.
    McCabe DP; Robertson CL; Smith AD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):633-44. PubMed ID: 16019640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: behavioral and pupillometric data.
    Heitz RP; Schrock JC; Payne TW; Engle RW
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 17910734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation into the significance of task difficulty and divided allocation of resources on the glucose memory facilitation effect.
    Sünram-Lea SI; Foster JK; Durlach P; Perez C
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Apr; 160(4):387-97. PubMed ID: 11919666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 59.