These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21645897)

  • 1. Validation and clinical impact of paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: A systematic review.
    Kottner J; Hauss A; Schlüer AB; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Jun; 50(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 21645897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrater agreement, reliability and validity of the Glamorgan Paediatric Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
    Kottner J; Kenzler M; Wilborn D
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Apr; 23(7-8):1165-9. PubMed ID: 23121342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
    Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of Glamorgan Paediatric Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
    Willock J; Anthony D; Richardson J
    Paediatr Nurs; 2008 Sep; 20(7):14-9. PubMed ID: 18808051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SIRA+P: Development and Testing.
    Foster KL; Bergerhofer LD; Smith JB; Fix MM; Olney A; Sherman A
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2017; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28094094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the performance of the Braden Q and the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in general and intensive care paediatric and neonatal units.
    Willock J; Habiballah L; Long D; Palmer K; Anthony D
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 May; 25(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 27020863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.
    Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Lopez-Medina IM; Alvarez-Nieto C
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 16553695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 2003 national pediatric pressure ulcer and skin breakdown prevalence survey: a multisite study.
    McLane KM; Bookout K; McCord S; McCain J; Jefferson LS
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 15851858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale.
    Willock J; Baharestani MM; Anthony D
    J Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 18(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19131913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the Glamorgan Scale in a paediatric intensive care unit: agreement and reliability].
    Kottner J; Schröer F; Tannen A
    Pflege; 2012 Dec; 25(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 23188755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency of pressure ulcers in the paediatric population: a literature review and new empirical data.
    Kottner J; Wilborn D; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Oct; 47(10):1330-40. PubMed ID: 20673895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
    García-Molina P; Balaguer López E; Verdú J; Nolasco A; García Fernández FP
    J Nurs Manag; 2018 Sep; 26(6):744-756. PubMed ID: 29656490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prognostic ability of early Braden Q Scores in critically ill children.
    Tume LN; Siner S; Scott E; Lane S
    Nurs Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24529107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.
    Kottner J; Dassen T; Tannen A
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 18986650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Analysis of risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer].
    Moreno-Pina JP; Richart-Martínez M; Guirao-Goris JA; Duarte-Climents G
    Enferm Clin; 2007; 17(4):186-97. PubMed ID: 17915121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
    Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Retrospective Analysis of Pressure Ulcer Incidence and Modified Braden Scale Score Risk Classifications.
    Chen HL; Cao YJ; Wang J; Huai BS
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Sep; 61(9):26-30. PubMed ID: 26367479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.